From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Samuel Wales Subject: Re: Quoting characters? Date: Fri, 20 Jan 2012 23:04:34 -0700 Message-ID: References: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.92]:45130) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1RoU47-0003tA-Cz for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Sat, 21 Jan 2012 01:04:43 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1RoU43-0002RE-7U for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Sat, 21 Jan 2012 01:04:39 -0500 Received: from mail-iy0-f169.google.com ([209.85.210.169]:58169) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1RoU43-0002R8-3b for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Sat, 21 Jan 2012 01:04:35 -0500 Received: by iadj38 with SMTP id j38so2325416iad.0 for ; Fri, 20 Jan 2012 22:04:34 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org To: Yu Cc: org-mode mailing list No solution, but sympathy. Syntax risk is difficult to prevent in Org I wonder if we can come up with incremental improvements that involve more universal escaping, quoting, nesting, etc. mechanisms somehow? (This is /not/ intended to be a sly plug for my universal syntax proposal. That's not intended to replace all existing syntax, but only to be used for future syntax. However, I do have a list of parsing risk issues on the list someplace that might be a reference.) -- The Kafka Pandemic: http://thekafkapandemic.blogspot.com === Bigotry against people with serious diseases is still bigotry.