From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Samuel Wales <samologist@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: agenda: personal priority for today
Date: Wed, 10 Apr 2013 12:50:55 -0700
Message-ID: <CAJcAo8uYuPHkKVk_ztqNo3pR9ykLrH_WqVkxO+k9WhOaEa-b+Q@mail.gmail.com>
References: <51655C8A.4070806@haas-heinrich.de>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Return-path: <emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>
Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:49338)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <samologist@gmail.com>) id 1UQ12n-0006dN-VQ
	for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Wed, 10 Apr 2013 15:50:59 -0400
Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <samologist@gmail.com>) id 1UQ12m-0004ML-C0
	for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Wed, 10 Apr 2013 15:50:57 -0400
Received: from mail-wi0-x232.google.com ([2a00:1450:400c:c05::232]:39539)
	by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <samologist@gmail.com>) id 1UQ12m-0004M4-30
	for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Wed, 10 Apr 2013 15:50:56 -0400
Received: by mail-wi0-f178.google.com with SMTP id ez12so860574wid.17
	for <emacs-orgmode@gnu.org>; Wed, 10 Apr 2013 12:50:55 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <51655C8A.4070806@haas-heinrich.de>
List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." <emacs-orgmode.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/options/emacs-orgmode>,
	<mailto:emacs-orgmode-request@gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/emacs-orgmode>
List-Post: <mailto:emacs-orgmode@gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:emacs-orgmode-request@gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-orgmode>,
	<mailto:emacs-orgmode-request@gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
Sender: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
To: Michael Heinrich <michael@haas-heinrich.de>
Cc: emacs-orgmode@gnu.org

Yes, it is possible.

I use priorities locally.  That is, they sort in the outline and do
not have global semantics.  Therefore, they have no meaning in the
agenda.  Perhaps someday I will figure out how to remove the cookies
from the agenda.

You can do the opposite from me, using priorities only in the agenda,
but it sounds like you want both.  Not a bad idea.

There are two concepts:

  1] global priorities
  2] per-agenda-view priorities

I am not sure which you are referring to.  1] can be done using a
property and user-defined sorting in the agenda.  It can also be done
using a tag [aa bb cc].

2] would require storing the view type.

Samuel

-- 
The Kafka Pandemic: http://thekafkapandemic.blogspot.com

The disease DOES progress.  MANY people have died from it.  ANYBODY
can get it.  There is NO hope without action.  This means YOU.