From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Samuel Wales <samologist@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC] Could we get rid of Org specific "mark ring"
Date: Tue, 30 Jan 2018 19:02:52 -0700
Message-ID: <CAJcAo8uY=unNM5sfTMhGt1ijKc-RJzNtEbTeObGGw-OdQD4XaQ@mail.gmail.com>
References: <87o9lcntdq.fsf@nicolasgoaziou.fr>
	<CAJcAo8tSChMw42foWEGQOfYXfFy7FwnMYjFVUh_cm9YMWO2+CA@mail.gmail.com>
	<87po5rxcgq.fsf@nicolasgoaziou.fr>
	<CAJcAo8ss=sn_S1JWsN=jwvY=PmN=NLQDN6xUM89gULKcst6JRA@mail.gmail.com>
	<87fu6nx93a.fsf@nicolasgoaziou.fr>
	<CAJcAo8v3XwO-Tbb=_xdekU1KtyqkJM23nH0q-JXVG-embixfyg@mail.gmail.com>
	<87bmhbx7z6.fsf@nicolasgoaziou.fr>
	<CAJcAo8sbUv2MQiGcfDxBifTVwfg-jVO_NJV=UD2QpQuFMYaFjg@mail.gmail.com>
	<CAJr1M6fyE0vp7sDSDHpJSRCHcwJUmXkTf5LQjRy7JrzedQJGOw@mail.gmail.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Return-path: <emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>
Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:59074)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <samologist@gmail.com>) id 1eghji-0000dW-T3
	for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Tue, 30 Jan 2018 21:02:55 -0500
Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <samologist@gmail.com>) id 1eghji-0007B2-7l
	for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Tue, 30 Jan 2018 21:02:54 -0500
Received: from mail-it0-x22a.google.com ([2607:f8b0:4001:c0b::22a]:35991)
	by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16)
	(Exim 4.71) (envelope-from <samologist@gmail.com>)
	id 1eghji-0007Ay-3K
	for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Tue, 30 Jan 2018 21:02:54 -0500
Received: by mail-it0-x22a.google.com with SMTP id n206so2957513itg.1
	for <emacs-orgmode@gnu.org>; Tue, 30 Jan 2018 18:02:53 -0800 (PST)
In-Reply-To: <CAJr1M6fyE0vp7sDSDHpJSRCHcwJUmXkTf5LQjRy7JrzedQJGOw@mail.gmail.com>
List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." <emacs-orgmode.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/options/emacs-orgmode>,
	<mailto:emacs-orgmode-request@gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/emacs-orgmode/>
List-Post: <mailto:emacs-orgmode@gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:emacs-orgmode-request@gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-orgmode>,
	<mailto:emacs-orgmode-request@gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
Sender: "Emacs-orgmode"
	<emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>
To: Allen Li <vianchielfaura@gmail.com>
Cc: Org Mode List <emacs-orgmode@gnu.org>, Nicolas Goaziou <mail@nicolasgoaziou.fr>

On 1/30/18, Allen Li <vianchielfaura@gmail.com> wrote:
> It does change org behavior, since the native mark ring
> distinguishes local from global, whereas org-mark-ring does not.
> With the proposed change, there won't be a single
> org-mark-ring-goto, you would have to make sure you call the
> right command out of pop-to-mark-command or pop-global-mark.

thanks.  then i oppose this change.

it seems crazy to have to think about whether where you will be going
is in the same buffer or not.  if that is what you mean.

i would be ok with it only if the global mark ring worked like the org
mark ring.