From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Samuel Wales <samologist@gmail.com>
Subject: [fr] mark ring forward and backward
Date: Sat, 20 Jan 2018 17:36:38 -0700
Message-ID: <CAJcAo8uG4jBbQh4H5bXmmZXuvp3M4G1rLr1Cn+84iYsG0RTwLg@mail.gmail.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Return-path: <emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>
Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:50226)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <samologist@gmail.com>) id 1ed3cn-000088-S4
	for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Sat, 20 Jan 2018 19:36:42 -0500
Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <samologist@gmail.com>) id 1ed3cn-0001Cy-4c
	for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Sat, 20 Jan 2018 19:36:41 -0500
Received: from mail-it0-x22a.google.com ([2607:f8b0:4001:c0b::22a]:39765)
	by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16)
	(Exim 4.71) (envelope-from <samologist@gmail.com>)
	id 1ed3cm-0001Bw-VN
	for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Sat, 20 Jan 2018 19:36:41 -0500
Received: by mail-it0-x22a.google.com with SMTP id 68so6088955ite.4
	for <emacs-orgmode@gnu.org>; Sat, 20 Jan 2018 16:36:40 -0800 (PST)
List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." <emacs-orgmode.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/options/emacs-orgmode>,
	<mailto:emacs-orgmode-request@gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/emacs-orgmode/>
List-Post: <mailto:emacs-orgmode@gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:emacs-orgmode-request@gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-orgmode>,
	<mailto:emacs-orgmode-request@gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
Sender: "Emacs-orgmode"
	<emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>
To: emacs-orgmode@gnu.org

idk if this is already possible.

in the org mark ring, i want to keep a history of places gone, and go
backward and forward in it.

is this a coherent request that is not already implemented?