From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Samuel Wales Subject: Re: Citation syntax: a revised proposal Date: Fri, 20 Feb 2015 12:45:12 -0700 Message-ID: References: <87k2zjnc0e.fsf@berkeley.edu> <87bnkvm8la.fsf@berkeley.edu> <87zj8co3se.fsf@berkeley.edu> <87ioezooi2.fsf@berkeley.edu> <87mw4bpaiu.fsf@nicolasgoaziou.fr> <8761aznpiq.fsf@berkeley.edu> <87twyjnh0r.fsf@nicolasgoaziou.fr> <87oaopx24e.fsf@berkeley.edu> <87k2zd4f3w.fsf@nicolasgoaziou.fr> <87egpkv8g9.fsf@berkeley.edu> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:47980) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1YOtVk-0008Hz-RJ for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Fri, 20 Feb 2015 14:45:17 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1YOtVi-0008Np-OX for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Fri, 20 Feb 2015 14:45:16 -0500 Received: from mail-lb0-x22d.google.com ([2a00:1450:4010:c04::22d]:44044) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1YOtVi-0008NC-GS for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Fri, 20 Feb 2015 14:45:14 -0500 Received: by lbiz12 with SMTP id z12so8266932lbi.11 for ; Fri, 20 Feb 2015 11:45:12 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <87egpkv8g9.fsf@berkeley.edu> List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org To: Richard Lawrence Cc: emacs-orgmode@gnu.org On 2/20/15, Richard Lawrence wrote: > If there are others (John? Aaron? Samuel?) who think they really need > the {:key val} syntax *over and above* a subtype designation, please > speak up! i have no comments on citations per se. i just think the syntax we design should, if possible, be so general that it can be used for future features, including 100% unrelated features, and also for future subfeatures of any feature, including citations. to me, that means plist or similar. basically, i am concerned about syntax creep in the big picture and its downstream consequences. for example, it's more efficient to support, and for the user to remember, a single general syntax than a whole bunch of special syntaxes. if everybody is already thinking along the same lines, great. samuel -- The Kafka Pandemic: http://thekafkapandemic.blogspot.com The disease DOES progress. MANY people have died from it. And ANYBODY can get it. Denmark: free Karina Hansen NOW.