From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Samuel Wales Subject: Re: if we operate on a subtree, perhaps we could adjust levels Date: Thu, 17 Apr 2014 02:43:24 -0700 Message-ID: References: <87y4zc3ss0.fsf@bzg.ath.cx> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:38517) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Waiqv-0000Ai-JX for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Thu, 17 Apr 2014 05:43:30 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Waiqs-0001V6-4h for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Thu, 17 Apr 2014 05:43:29 -0400 In-Reply-To: <87y4zc3ss0.fsf@bzg.ath.cx> List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org To: Bastien Cc: emacs-orgmode@gnu.org On 4/11/14, Bastien wrote: > That's expected. Users don't think Org is clever enough to > decrypt-demote-subtrees-then-re-encrypt on the fly. i was not suggesting this.