From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Samuel Wales <samologist@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: bug: z in agenda goes to wrong headline
Date: Wed, 5 Oct 2011 19:48:40 -0700
Message-ID: <CAJcAo8tsgQ4sr03Y0Omxmf0-pPuDrz0BVSkQKGA_aDBtTjD7pQ@mail.gmail.com>
References: <CAJcAo8skCMeqr9daK9FjjEcHUTOdWGC8ZdT+Dwbi6QiGiWnCRg@mail.gmail.com>
	<CAJcAo8uxUZtiJd2AmSAOFd7s6+q_nNwx2Mh7bzLxpW5D8b9VUw@mail.gmail.com>
	<878voy3la3.fsf@norang.ca>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Return-path: <emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>
Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.92]:43685)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <samologist@gmail.com>) id 1RBe0o-0000CK-UD
	for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Wed, 05 Oct 2011 22:48:43 -0400
Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <samologist@gmail.com>) id 1RBe0n-0001zg-SC
	for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Wed, 05 Oct 2011 22:48:42 -0400
Received: from mail-iy0-f169.google.com ([209.85.210.169]:64765)
	by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <samologist@gmail.com>) id 1RBe0n-0001za-KV
	for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Wed, 05 Oct 2011 22:48:41 -0400
Received: by iaen33 with SMTP id n33so3334607iae.0
	for <emacs-orgmode@gnu.org>; Wed, 05 Oct 2011 19:48:40 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <878voy3la3.fsf@norang.ca>
List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." <emacs-orgmode.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/options/emacs-orgmode>,
	<mailto:emacs-orgmode-request@gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: </archive/html/emacs-orgmode>
List-Post: <mailto:emacs-orgmode@gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:emacs-orgmode-request@gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-orgmode>,
	<mailto:emacs-orgmode-request@gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
Sender: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
To: Bernt Hansen <bernt@norang.ca>
Cc: emacs-orgmode@gnu.org

Hi Bernt,

As I wrote, that's what I figured.  :)

I wonder though if a check should be performed in similar cases.

Samuel