From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Samuel Wales <samologist@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: is this spreadsheet correct?
Date: Mon, 3 Dec 2012 10:39:34 -0700
Message-ID: <CAJcAo8tpzz8JQdPTR0PQrtMwXDw4PX8+4xTxu3SQa6LmEpA6mw@mail.gmail.com>
References: <CAJcAo8sF=2UG0ONvq4SSpRLyKfo-0VJfhsFMUerOJokovCLC2g@mail.gmail.com>
	<87hao4g55n.fsf@Rainer.invalid>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Return-path: <emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>
Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:38426)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <samologist@gmail.com>) id 1TfZzb-000848-GP
	for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Mon, 03 Dec 2012 12:39:47 -0500
Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <samologist@gmail.com>) id 1TfZzV-0007q2-3Q
	for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Mon, 03 Dec 2012 12:39:43 -0500
Received: from mail-la0-f41.google.com ([209.85.215.41]:56088)
	by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <samologist@gmail.com>) id 1TfZzU-0007po-R6
	for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Mon, 03 Dec 2012 12:39:37 -0500
Received: by mail-la0-f41.google.com with SMTP id m15so2664212lah.0
	for <emacs-orgmode@gnu.org>; Mon, 03 Dec 2012 09:39:35 -0800 (PST)
In-Reply-To: <87hao4g55n.fsf@Rainer.invalid>
List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." <emacs-orgmode.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/options/emacs-orgmode>,
	<mailto:emacs-orgmode-request@gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/emacs-orgmode>
List-Post: <mailto:emacs-orgmode@gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:emacs-orgmode-request@gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-orgmode>,
	<mailto:emacs-orgmode-request@gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
Sender: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
To: Achim Gratz <Stromeko@nexgo.de>
Cc: emacs-orgmode@gnu.org

On 12/2/12, Achim Gratz <Stromeko@nexgo.de> wrote:
> Also, it seems you didn't have the cursor
> inside the table.

The bug occurs when point is in the table.

Are you trying to say that the stack trace would be normal if you
executed on the tblfm line?  If so, I think that's an error message
bug.