From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Samuel Wales <samologist@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: FR: revivable marks in agenda
Date: Thu, 13 Oct 2011 09:57:49 -0700
Message-ID: <CAJcAo8sVStxus1=CAuWj_wALeDs7vcQ7C3anKx7O4+k4qgLFqw@mail.gmail.com>
References: <CAJcAo8uGVEOV9J75VjF+4gSuLhNWu-6C0BBwhu4733mjwyEBTw@mail.gmail.com>
	<4E96ED65.6060803@gmail.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Return-path: <emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>
Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.92]:41850)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <samologist@gmail.com>) id 1REObS-0004cZ-AD
	for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Thu, 13 Oct 2011 12:57:58 -0400
Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <samologist@gmail.com>) id 1REObO-0001jh-BZ
	for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Thu, 13 Oct 2011 12:57:54 -0400
Received: from mail-iy0-f169.google.com ([209.85.210.169]:59279)
	by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <samologist@gmail.com>) id 1REObO-0001ja-6W
	for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Thu, 13 Oct 2011 12:57:50 -0400
Received: by iagf6 with SMTP id f6so77449iag.0
	for <emacs-orgmode@gnu.org>; Thu, 13 Oct 2011 09:57:49 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <4E96ED65.6060803@gmail.com>
List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." <emacs-orgmode.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/options/emacs-orgmode>,
	<mailto:emacs-orgmode-request@gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/emacs-orgmode>
List-Post: <mailto:emacs-orgmode@gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:emacs-orgmode-request@gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-orgmode>,
	<mailto:emacs-orgmode-request@gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
Sender: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
To: Andrea Crotti <andrea.crotti.0@gmail.com>
Cc: emacs-orgmode@gnu.org

On 2011-10-13, Andrea Crotti <andrea.crotti.0@gmail.com> wrote:
> Well in general you should use some revision control system,

Those do not store things that never save to disk.