From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Tomas Grigera <tgrigera@gmail.com>
Subject: Problem (bug?) evaluating octave code ("function name does not agree
 with file name)
Date: Tue, 18 Aug 2015 10:42:11 -0300
Message-ID: <CAJMNdQKk8qgBr70L=grFo6sg_z7B1oEEPVjNuPD9iTYF0MnsyA@mail.gmail.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Return-path: <emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>
Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:38728)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <tgrigera@gmail.com>) id 1ZRh9e-0004Po-Nr
	for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Tue, 18 Aug 2015 09:42:22 -0400
Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <tgrigera@gmail.com>) id 1ZRh9Z-0007QP-3J
	for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Tue, 18 Aug 2015 09:42:18 -0400
Received: from mail-ob0-x229.google.com ([2607:f8b0:4003:c01::229]:36431)
	by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <tgrigera@gmail.com>) id 1ZRh9Y-0007Q2-Vv
	for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Tue, 18 Aug 2015 09:42:13 -0400
Received: by obkg7 with SMTP id g7so9512955obk.3
	for <emacs-orgmode@gnu.org>; Tue, 18 Aug 2015 06:42:11 -0700 (PDT)
List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." <emacs-orgmode.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/options/emacs-orgmode>,
	<mailto:emacs-orgmode-request@gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/emacs-orgmode>
List-Post: <mailto:emacs-orgmode@gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:emacs-orgmode-request@gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-orgmode>,
	<mailto:emacs-orgmode-request@gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
Sender: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
To: emacs-orgmode <emacs-orgmode@gnu.org>

Hello list,

I am a very happy user of orgmode and babel.  I recently picked up a
document from last year, and found that code blocks that used to
evaluate fine now don't.  A code block like this

#+BEGIN_SRC octave
1;
function y=dup(x)
  y=2*x;
end

dup(2)
#+END_SRC

fails with

: warning: function name 'dup' does not agree with function file name ''
: error: 'dup' undefined near line 1 column 1

on evaluating, despite the "1;" trick at the beginning.  Saving to
foo.m and running from octave works fine.

I'm using

Emacs 24.4.1
Org-mode version 8.3.1 (8.3.1-56-g17a225-elpa)
GNU Octave, version 3.8.2


There has been some change, of which I am unaware, in the way babel
handles this block that leads to this behaviour.  However, it seems to
me that it is a well-formed block and should evaluate fine.  Am I
wrong?

Thanks in advance

Tomas