I think you have missed the main point. My point was first to find some
format that pandoc faithfully converts to docx with all the features you
need, and then we can figure out how to turn org-ref/org into that format.
So, if you can write a LaTeX document that is correctly converted to docx
(correct bibliography, figure labels, and cross-references, correct code,
etc), then we can probably get org to output the right latex. But if LaTeX
isn't converted to docx correctly in pandoc, it does not seem likely that
org will either with any simple exporter.

John

-----------------------------------
Professor John Kitchin
Doherty Hall A207F
Department of Chemical Engineering
Carnegie Mellon University
Pittsburgh, PA 15213
412-268-7803
@johnkitchin
http://kitchingroup.cheme.cmu.edu



On Mon, Apr 29, 2019 at 5:19 PM Emmanuel Charpentier <
emm.charpentier@free.fr> wrote:

> Dear John,
>
> Le lundi 29 avril 2019 à 16:57 -0400, John Kitchin a écrit :
>
> For org-ref, there isn't much magic on what happens on export. LaTeX is
> certainly the most well supported, and it seems like org -> latex -> pandoc
> is the only way that makes sense to get to docx to me.  Using pandoc on org
> files directly is probably hopeless unless you can get pandoc to include
> some definitions for the org-ref links.
>
>
> This might be difficult : the development of ox-pandoc seems to not be
> very active at the moment...
>
> Some of the link types in org-ref have some exports defined for org, html,
> latex, sometimes ascii. If one of these works well with pandoc we could try
> to make them output something useful for them, or at least make sure that
> org->org export turns them into something useful.
>
>
> I'm currently looking at the ox-latex exporter in order to understand what
> it does for source blocks with org's names and captions (and try to fix the
> fact that they are labeled and nubered as figures...). Theis understanding
> might help me to go in the direction you suggest.
>
> Getting figure/table numbers has always been tricky; I don't think this
> worked well with pandoc, and handling it on the org side requires some
> preprocessing to add numbers. For now, the ox-word exporter in scimax comes
> closest, but it isn't a feature I use a lot, so it hasn't been improved in
> a while.
>
>
> Again, looking at what ox-latex does for org's names and captions might be
> helpful. Ox-pandoc seems to do a decent job on docx output.
>
>
> John
>
> -----------------------------------
> Professor John Kitchin
> Doherty Hall A207F
> Department of Chemical Engineering
> Carnegie Mellon University
> Pittsburgh, PA 15213
> 412-268-7803
> @johnkitchin
> http://kitchingroup.cheme.cmu.edu
>
>
>
> On Mon, Apr 29, 2019 at 1:06 PM Emmanuel Charpentier <
> emm.charpentier@free.fr> wrote:
>
> Dear list,
>
> one of my uses od org-mode is to prepare documents wrapping R (and
> sometimes Sagemath) call results in interpretation text. My reference
> output is .pdf documents, but I *have* to prepare a .docx version (for
> use in managerial spheres, where computer literacy is *very* low.
> Cross-references and citations are a sine qua non, maths are useful.
>
> I have been annoyed by a couple of deficiencies and inconsistencies
> between exporters, so I prepared a test document testing various cases.
> This documents and some exports are attached (NE = Native exporter, PE
> = ox-pandoc exporter).
>
> TL;DR :
>
>   * I tested the built-in latex/pdf exporter as well as ox-pandoc, the
> latter both for .pdf and .docx export. The built-in ODT exporter
> doesn't export citations ; therefore, I didn't test it further.
>
>
>   * org-ref's :labels and :refs do not export to anything but the
> built-in latex exporter. The native system of #+NAME:s and #+CAPTION:s,
> a bit on the heavy side, seems not to fail (except that they do not
> expand in a caption...).
>
>   * Maths, tables, figures are unproblematic.
>
>   * The requirements of org-reftex, the built-in latex exporter and ox-
> pandoc being mutually incompatible, and some ingenuity is required. see
> the attached org source. Org-ref's requirements do not simplify the
> situation...
>
>   * Code snippets (i. e. source blocks exporting code) have a
> captioning/numbering problem :
>
>     - With the built-in latex exporter, they are numbered and labeled
> as figures.
>
>     - The pandoc latex exporter numbers them separately (as seen by
> referencing them), but do not output this number (nor the category)
> before the caption.
>
>     - The pandoc .docx exporter works as advertised.
>
> So I have a couple of questions:
>
>   * What can be done to reconcile org-ref's, latex-exporter's and ox-
> pandoc's requirements for bibliographies ?
>
>   * How to fix the pdf exporters' quirks with code snippets ?
>
> HTH,
>
> --
> Emmanuel Charpentier
>
>