Omid: The idea is C-x 3, clone-indirect-buffer, so I can see and modify the same buffer in two different places. So.. A workaround, not a solution.


On Thu, Jun 5, 2014 at 3:28 PM, Omid <omidlink@gmail.com> wrote:

With clone-indirect-buffer you'll get a twin copy of your original
buffer. You are in effect editing the same buffer in two different ,
with some additional niceties like having separate modes and
narrow-to-region, etc (see an example usage at
http://demonastery.org/2013/04/emacs-narrow-to-region-indirect/). I
don't see how this can help with your problem, though.

On 06/05/2014 12:52 PM, Thorsten Jolitz wrote:
> Aldric Giacomoni <trevoke@gmail.com> writes:
>
>> I'd like to be able to create multiple tables on the same rows, like
>> such:
>>
>> | Group | Name | | Something | Else |
>> |----------+----------| |-----------------+----- --|
>> | 1 | foo | | Yes | No |
>> |----------+----------| |-----------------+-------|
>>
>> This might be based on a pretty fundamental misunderstanding of how to
>> use tables, org-mode and emacs, but I would find it useful to be able
>> to compare tables and making changes easily without scrolling too
>> much.
>>
>> Someone on #emacs pointed me towards clone-indirect-buffer, which
>> works for my purposes, but I figured I'd ask here and ask all you
>> experts if this idea is reasonable or crazy-pants.
>
> 1+ for crazy-pants
>

--
Omid

Sent from my Emacs