It is better.  To really stress it, I tried a two-row table:

#+begin_src clojure :results table
  [[:ny :nj :ct]
   [  7   9   4]]
#+end_src

#+RESULTS:
| :ny | :nj | :ct |
|   7 |   9 |   4 |


On Wed, Jan 29, 2014 at 10:28 AM, Bastien <bzg@gnu.org> wrote:

> Eric Schulte <schulte.eric@gmail.com> writes:
>
> > Try evaluating the following and see how it works.
>
> It works fine for me:
>
> ,----
> | #+BEGIN_SRC clojure :results table
> | (map #(* %1 3) '(1 2 3))
> | #+END_SRC
> |
> | #+RESULTS:
> | | 3 | 6 | 9 |
> `----
>
> > This simply copies
> > the results handling from the slime backend to the cider backend (which
> > currently does not appear to have any results handling).  While you're
> > at it the nrepl results handling looks broken to me as well.
>
> Yep.
>
> Greg, please test Eric's function above for all your use cases and let
> us know if it covers them all -- then I'll fix this and the nrepl case
> too.
>
> Thanks Eric!
>
> --
>  Bastien
>
>