On Tue, Nov 8, 2011 at 10:31 AM, Sebastien Vauban <wxhgmqzgwmuf@spammotel.com> wrote:
Hi Eric,

(Due to a high "buzyness" level, I've been a bit out of the discussion for one
week or so)

Eric Schulte wrote:
> The attached patch implements this latest "propname+" suggestion.  When
> applied it results in the behavior shown below.
>
> I'm inclined to go with this as a solution moving forward.
>
> Thoughts?
>
> #+property: var    foo=1
> #+property: var+ , bar=2
> #+begin_src emacs-lisp
>   (+ foo bar)
> #+end_src

So, in a way, adding the + after `var' is how you tell Org that this is an
accumulated property?

Two questions:

1. Why not the + after the property keyword (property+)? I guess because it's
  more against other aspects of Org internals?  Anyway, putting + after the
  var sounds as right to me -- maybe better even if we consider that you
  declare var as accumulated, writing so.

2. Must there be a first `var' without `+'?  Accepted, tolerated or wrong?  I
  mean, I'm sure that, due to heavy file editing, we'll sometimes have:

Might be a good idea to tolerate this.
 

  #+property: var+   foo=1
  #+property: var+ , bar=2
  #+begin_src emacs-lisp
    (+ foo bar)
  #+end_src

> #+results:
> : 3
>
> #+begin_src emacs-lisp
>   (org-entry-get (point) "var" t)
> #+end_src
>
> #+results:
> : foo=1, bar=2
>
> * overwriting a file-wide property
>   :PROPERTIES:
>   :var:      foo=7
>   :END:
>
> #+begin_src emacs-lisp
>   foo
> #+end_src
>
> #+results:
> : 7
>
> #+begin_src emacs-lisp
>   (org-entry-get (point) "var" t)
> #+end_src
>
> #+results:
> : foo=7
>
> * appending to a file-wide property
>   :PROPERTIES:
>   :var+:      , baz=3
>   :END:

To be honest, the only thing that I dislike is the comma in the above line.
Not intuitive at all. Quite hard to read.

Can't the comma be implicitly added by the `+' after the property name?

On the one hand, it might have one additional advantage:

  #+property: var   foo="This is a very long text"
  #+property: var+ "with even more."

Would foo be: 
"This is a very long text with even more"

Could one make the "," implicit, if the value follows the

x=y

style, while otherwise just concatenate the value to the one before?




That would allow one to simply write:

  * appending to a file-wide property
    :PROPERTIES:
    :var+:        baz=3
    :END:

and have the correct values.

> #+begin_src emacs-lisp
>   (+ foo bar baz)
> #+end_src
>
> #+results:
> : 6
>
> #+begin_src emacs-lisp
>   (org-entry-get (point) "var" t)
> #+end_src
>
> #+results:
> : foo=1, bar=2, baz=3

Thanks.

Best regards,
 Seb

--
Sebastien Vauban





--
Rainer M. Krug, PhD (Conservation Ecology, SUN), MSc (Conservation Biology, UCT), Dipl. Phys. (Germany)

Centre of Excellence for Invasion Biology
Stellenbosch University
South Africa

Tel :       +33 - (0)9 53 10 27 44
Cell:       +33 - (0)6 85 62 59 98
Fax (F):       +33 - (0)9 58 10 27 44

Fax (D):    +49 - (0)3 21 21 25 22 44

email:      Rainer@krugs.de

Skype:      RMkrug