From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mp1 ([2001:41d0:2:4a6f::]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)) by ms11 with LMTPS id SKm7Aj8W3V4VOwAA0tVLHw (envelope-from ) for ; Sun, 07 Jun 2020 16:30:55 +0000 Received: from aspmx1.migadu.com ([2001:41d0:2:4a6f::]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)) by mp1 with LMTPS id 4HwOOj4W3V4TCgAAbx9fmQ (envelope-from ) for ; Sun, 07 Jun 2020 16:30:54 +0000 Received: from lists.gnu.org (lists.gnu.org [209.51.188.17]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by aspmx1.migadu.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id CDF9794053B for ; Sun, 7 Jun 2020 16:30:53 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost ([::1]:54828 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1jhyCC-0004sz-Oj for larch@yhetil.org; Sun, 07 Jun 2020 12:30:52 -0400 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:43888) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1jhyBn-0004sl-1v for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Sun, 07 Jun 2020 12:30:27 -0400 Received: from mail-ej1-x636.google.com ([2a00:1450:4864:20::636]:36305) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1jhyBl-0003Tq-46 for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Sun, 07 Jun 2020 12:30:26 -0400 Received: by mail-ej1-x636.google.com with SMTP id n21so1133053ejg.3 for ; Sun, 07 Jun 2020 09:30:23 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=zzamboni-org.20150623.gappssmtp.com; s=20150623; h=mime-version:from:date:message-id:subject:to; bh=whFmbyYNA0gJY6RWoKx8SzHdfpsF2/Bc+Acmo9Vsxuw=; b=yWp84FXJWtuaa0dTzF2beno5oL6ofTiHqh2hOoM/JD8SJHS4jAvm6BQaqQ7RNVnr2a nBriOlVWsjY3mJHmYxka0q4JJQJxLK7+Iker8Ma4jbNnGLkiizw5/k0oWUOZC4r+zIuP Fb6uXCtu52r4jBZ0ugKS9bC+8UbadarY6obM5KZ+MlD7108jJXEg4ou1EN6QdTgITIpN sHz7c/dst7BwnIvPBNY7p4dte/OfhCVJRRDnQOaAIqC7QenZodjjCIyOPjRzdy1T9k4w QvRC55Ox1vBozRpiARWh9HsiWN9YY34QcTrOE8gHys6KxDXiWJKNqKiyt+gW1x42Y3Ul 5T5Q== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:from:date:message-id:subject:to; bh=whFmbyYNA0gJY6RWoKx8SzHdfpsF2/Bc+Acmo9Vsxuw=; b=gQM5k2GxtV3drN6MGeT/eUsPtvAjGc66I9n6uGcRAIIZBVqehmTcIG9CoaSxT905iN x461EiSe147adQDHS3dAhCgIFZtVfBeB4fandZl8pVkh0TURxb5ux2Xvo7nbs2DeaTLY yFfaYtq/w46lWc6hPcBkf5hz4aW0YHFOC6Ym9d7p4v/QcNojTzH6pdGLRKNj4PEFAgFK y06ZaS99sqUcXS2nfPBFxQ7pCpg6wS8gYynoQdMpfmKheLGIq6FtmJ+Dj+MYD27wARDE RDamoMY2j+18Wa/J6HYtwbAU3FHH20csYm4BPYMelbymwlRXpUNr9q1xtlAx9+EnsHNe vXLg== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM532h5St4Tq7/vpsF0JjTbTBjExRLp7uYnKJeRXQhIWWWoLeYQGAP +zVN0MT8yW36MBzbr/89JdLx65rf3Xl6gVOx/YTI/v19UrU8gA== X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJybeMYZZ26Dp6deEg5puBFl1xD+RY98hivsiI5E0+tHSdJUfH+vrmkJTZrcucgEbV0RpMy2wzvGoGKxmnkDh34= X-Received: by 2002:a17:906:a458:: with SMTP id cb24mr17212820ejb.5.1591547421426; Sun, 07 Jun 2020 09:30:21 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 From: Diego Zamboni Date: Sun, 7 Jun 2020 18:30:10 +0200 Message-ID: Subject: ox-* vs org-* naming convention? To: Org-mode Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Received-SPF: none client-ip=2a00:1450:4864:20::636; envelope-from=diego@zzamboni.org; helo=mail-ej1-x636.google.com X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: No matching host in p0f cache. That's all we know. X-Spam_score_int: -18 X-Spam_score: -1.9 X-Spam_bar: - X-Spam_report: (-1.9 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001 autolearn=_AUTOLEARN X-Spam_action: no action X-BeenThere: emacs-orgmode@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org Sender: "Emacs-orgmode" X-Scanner: scn0 Authentication-Results: aspmx1.migadu.com; dkim=pass header.d=zzamboni-org.20150623.gappssmtp.com header.s=20150623 header.b=yWp84FXJ; dmarc=none; spf=pass (aspmx1.migadu.com: domain of emacs-orgmode-bounces@gnu.org designates 209.51.188.17 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=emacs-orgmode-bounces@gnu.org X-Spam-Score: -0.21 X-TUID: KVyVJkPR3rqL Hi, I am working on submitting a new set of exporters I've been working on (https://gitlab.com/zzamboni/ox-leanpub) to MELPA, and I received feedback [1] about the discrepancy between the package names (ox-leanpub-*) and the functions they define (org-leanpub-*). This is also flagged by =package-lint=. [1] https://github.com/melpa/melpa/pull/6942 I based these names on what I've observed in existing exporters - e.g. ox-hugo, ox-latex, ox-reveal and most others define functions named org-hugo-*, org-latex-*, org-reveal-* respectively. I wouldn't mind renaming the package to org-leanpub, but I worry whether this would affect its discoverability, and to diverge from existing convention for exporter packages. I would appreciate any feedback about this - what are strong arguments for or against insisting in this convention vs just adapting to the rules suggested by package-lint? Thanks in advance, --Diego