From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Richard Lawrence Subject: Re: Citations, continued Date: Sun, 8 Feb 2015 09:18:16 -0800 Message-ID: References: <87vbjmn6wy.fsf@berkeley.edu> <87sieokx8e.fsf@berkeley.edu> <54d04780.cb58460a.5243.2603@mx.google.com> <87h9v3li8t.fsf@berkeley.edu> <54d078ff.b044440a.06ec.3cf6@mx.google.com> <87d25rkmag.fsf@berkeley.edu> <54d1bc7b.c57d440a.3c5d.2dca@mx.google.com> <87vbjh284z.fsf@nicolasgoaziou.fr> <87mw4tk4m7.fsf@berkeley.edu> <87oap7z664.fsf@nicolasgoaziou.fr> <87fvaibr3k.fsf@berkeley.edu> <87y4o9s5qc.fsf@nicolasgoaziou.fr> <87oap4sp1n.fsf@nicolasgoaziou.fr> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:44268) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1YKVV0-0005q0-3U for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Sun, 08 Feb 2015 12:18:23 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1YKVUv-0002oS-6L for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Sun, 08 Feb 2015 12:18:22 -0500 Received: from mail-yk0-f170.google.com ([209.85.160.170]:52752) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1YKVUv-0002nN-31 for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Sun, 08 Feb 2015 12:18:17 -0500 Received: by mail-yk0-f170.google.com with SMTP id q9so9618936ykb.1 for ; Sun, 08 Feb 2015 09:18:16 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <87oap4sp1n.fsf@nicolasgoaziou.fr> List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org To: Richard Lawrence , "emacs-orgmode@gnu.org" Hi Nicolas and all, On Sun, Feb 8, 2015 at 1:58 AM, Nicolas Goaziou wrote: > > - in-text citation > > [KEY] or [KEY suffix] > > [@item1] or [@item1 p. 30] or [@item1 p. 30, with suffix] > > - out-text citation > > [cite: prefix? key suffix?; prefix2? key2 suffix2? ...] > > [cite: see @item1 p. 34-35] or [cite: @item1 pp. 33, 35-37, and > nowhere else] or [cite: -@item1 p. 44] or even [cite: see @item1 p. > 34-35; also @item3 chap. 3] > > IMO it is quite readable. Yes, I like this better than your first proposal, or the citet/citep approach. But doesn't the first case pose the same performance problems as the Pandoc syntax, since it does away with the tag? Or are you thinking it's easier to parse because the key occurs immediately after the bracket, without a prefix...? Best, Richard