2015-03-27 7:57 GMT+01:00 Cecil Westerhof : > 2015-03-26 23:19 GMT+01:00 Cecil Westerhof : > >> 2015-03-26 22:49 GMT+01:00 Nick Dokos : >> >>> Cecil Westerhof writes: >>> >>> > ​In this way I do not get an empty column. It would be better when K >>> > would put between and below H and I, but I think I can live with it.​ >>> > >>> >>> Just put I after K and the subgraph. >>> >> >> ​That works. It is even better when I put both H and I after it. >> >> I also found a way to get resources at the correct place. >> > > ​I changed to a digraph: > #+BEGIN_SRC dot :file test.png :cmdline -Kdot -Tpng > digraph { > A > B > C > utilities [label = "Utility's"] > > D > E > F [shape = rectangle] > > > subgraph cluster_resources { > color=blue > resources [label = "Resources"] > } > > G > G_ [style="invisible"] > > K > subgraph cluster_ta { > color=blue > {rank = same; L, M} > L > M > } > H > I > > {rank = same; D, E, F} > {rank = same; G_, K} > > > A -> F > B -> F > C -> F > A -> D > utilities -> resources [style="invisible"] > > E -> F > > F -> K [dir = back] > F -> G [dir = back] > F -> H [dir = back] > F -> I [dir = back] > > G -> G_ [style="invisible"] > > K -> L > K -> M > L -> M > } > #+END_SRC > > There is only one problem: I see the arrowhead with: > utilities -> resources > and: > 'G -> G_' > > Is there a way to get rid of those? > ​I found that also: [style="invisible", arrowhead = "none"] -- Cecil Westerhof