2014-06-08 15:07 GMT+02:00 Eric Schulte <schulte.eric@gmail.com>:

> Nick Dokos <ndokos@gmail.com> writes:
>
> > Cecil Westerhof <cldwesterhof@gmail.com> writes:
> >
> >> At the moment I am using the following formula:
> >>     #+TBLFM: @<<$4..@>>$4 = $2 - $3 :: @>$2=vsum(@<<$2..@>>$2) ::
> >> @>$3=vsum(@<<$3..@>>$3) :: @>$4=vsum(@<<$4..@>>$4)
> >>
> >> This does what I want, but there are two things that could be improved.
> >>
> >> - The second, third and fourth formula do exactly the same, only on
> >> different columns. Could this be rewritten to one formula?
> >>
> >
> > --8<---------------cut here---------------start------------->8---
> > #+TBLFM: @<<$4..@>>$4 = $2 - $3 :: @>$2..$4=vsum(@<<$0..@>>$0)
> > --8<---------------cut here---------------end--------------->8---
> >
> > See (info "(org) References")
> >
> >> - The line becomes long and hard to evaluate for a person. Is there
> >> a possibility to put the formulas below each-other?
> >>
> >
> > I don't believe so but my belief may be out of date. It has been
> > discussed before: check the list archives.
>
> Sort of but not really.  See "Using multiple #+TBLFM lines" in the
> manual.
>

​That I found. Is handy, but only for debugging. But with the shortened
formula line, it is less of a problem.

-- 
Cecil Westerhof