On Tue, May 24, 2016 at 4:44 PM Nicolas Goaziou <mail@nicolasgoaziou.fr>
wrote:

> Hello,
>
> We do not have a char map specific to tables.
>
> In most cases, bindings are context-aware (see, e.g., the dauting C-c
> C-c). However, the bindings you cite are not claimed by other parts of
> Org, so they just do table specific stuff.
>

Thanks for the reply.

In that case, I think that the bind-keys approach is clean enough if a user
wants to prevent the org-table-* fn bindings from shadowing their global
map bindings when the point is not in a table.
-- 

-- 
Kaushal Modi