Hi guys,

Looks like I just reported the exact same bug few minutes back.

@Rasmus: Are you still working on committing the fix for this?

Thanks.

Kaushal

On Mon, May 23, 2016 at 5:42 PM Nicolas Goaziou <mail@nicolasgoaziou.fr>
wrote:

> Hello,
>
> Rasmus <rasmus@gmx.us> writes:
>
> > With the attached patch ox-latex seems to behave in this way.
>
> Thank you. Some comments follow.
>
> > Though perhaps there’s a more efficient way to get the first
> > footnote-reference to a given definition than trawling through with
> > org-export--footnote-reference-map.
>
> Couldn't you refer to the definition instead of the first reference ?
> There is a function grabbing it and it is unique for a given label.
> Also, not that `org-export-get-footnote-definition' doesn't return the
> definition itself, only its contents. Therefore the reference are
> different and there is no possible ambiguity.
>
> > Nicolas, where is the info plist documented or defined/populated?
>
> It is documented at
> <http://orgmode.org/worg/dev/org-export-reference.html>. However, caches
> used for memoization are not referenced.
>
> > +      ;; Use \footnotemark if the footnote has already been defined.
>
> The comment no longer seems accurate.
>
> > +      ((not (org-export-footnote-first-reference-p footnote-reference
> info))
> > +       (format "\\textsuperscript{\\ref{%s}}"
> > +            (org-latex--label
> > +             (catch 'exit
> > +               (org-export--footnote-reference-map
> > +                (lambda (f)
> > +                  (let ((l (org-element-property :label f)))
> > +                    (when (and l label (string= label l))
> > +                      (throw 'exit f))))
> > +                (plist-get info :parse-tree) info))
> > +             info t)))
>
> See above.
>
> > +      ;; Use \footnotemark if reference is within another footnote
> > +      ;; reference, footnote definition or table cell.
> > +      ((org-element-lineage footnote-reference
> > +                         '(footnote-reference footnote-definition
> table-cell))
> > +       "\\footnotemark")
> > +      ;; Otherwise, define it with \footnote command.
> > +      (t
> > +       (let ((def (org-export-get-footnote-definition
> footnote-reference info)))
> > +      (concat
> > +       (format "\\footnote{%s%s}" (org-trim (org-export-data def info))
> > +               (if (catch 'exit
> > +                     (org-export--footnote-reference-map
> > +                      (lambda (f)
> > +                        (let ((l (org-element-property :label f)))
> > +                          (when (and l label
> > +                                     (not (eq f footnote-reference))
> > +                                     (string= label l))
> > +                            (throw 'exit t))))
> > +                      (plist-get info :parse-tree) info))
> > +                   (org-latex--label footnote-reference info t t)
> > +                 ""))
>
> I'm not sure to understand the logic here. You seem to add a label to
> all references sharing a given label but the first one. Intuitively,
> I think it should be the opposite.
>
> Besides, in this branch of the `cond', all footnote references are the
> first for their their label.
>
> Wouldn't it be sufficient to use
>
>   (format "\\footnote{%s%s}"
>           (org-trim (org-export-data def info))
>           (org-latex--label def info t t))
>
> ?
>
> Regards,
>
> --
> Nicolas Goaziou
>
> --

Kaushal Modi