From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Kaushal Modi Subject: Re: Sync up the org in emacs master to org maint branch? Date: Thu, 26 Jan 2017 16:01:24 +0000 Message-ID: References: <87a8afaxlz.fsf@gmx.us> <83fuk63mq5.fsf@gnu.org> <874m0maq9e.fsf@gmx.us> <87r33psudf.fsf@kyleam.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=f403045f7f2aa1c769054701761a Return-path: In-Reply-To: <87r33psudf.fsf@kyleam.com> List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: "Emacs-devel" To: Kyle Meyer Cc: emacs-org list , Stefan Monnier , Rasmus , Emacs developers List-Id: emacs-orgmode.gnu.org --f403045f7f2aa1c769054701761a Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 On Thu, Jan 26, 2017 at 10:39 AM Kyle Meyer wrote: > Kaushal Modi writes: > > > On Thu, Jan 26, 2017 at 1:19 AM Kyle Meyer wrote: > > > >> We'd want at least one more release from maint, I think, so that'd be > >> 9.0.5. > > > > Would it be OK to sync the current stable 9.0.4, > > I don't think that's a good idea. Since 9.0.4, I've backported one > remaining commit from Emacs, I've adjusted :version in defcustoms to the > appropriate version for a sync targeting Emacs's master, and I've > cleaned up the spacing in a few places so that all the files pass > Emacs's pre-commit check. > Makes sense. Thanks for the explanation. > > We never know, we might end up with even higher stable releases by the > > time emacs 26.1 is released. > > I suspect we will, given that 9.0.1 -> 9.0.4 have all been released > since this November. > I don't believe that the target date has yet been set for releasing 26.1. We are currently on the release candidate testing stage of 25.2. So I will not be surprised if 26.1 get released even 3 months or 6 months from now. Eli? John? -- Kaushal Modi --f403045f7f2aa1c769054701761a Content-Type: text/html; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
On Thu, Jan 26= , 2017 at 10:39 AM Kyle Meyer <kyle@k= yleam.com> wrote:
Kaushal = Modi <kaushal.modi@gmail.com> writes:

> On Thu, Jan 26, 2017 at 1:19 AM Kyle Meyer <kyle@kyleam.com> w= rote:
>
>> We'd want at least one more release from maint, I think, so th= at'd be
>> 9.0.5.
>
> Would it be OK to sync the current stable 9.0.4,

I don't think that's a good idea.=C2=A0 Since 9.0.4, I've backp= orted one
remaining commit from Emacs, I've adjusted :version in defcustoms to th= e
appropriate version for a sync targeting Emacs's master, and I've cleaned up the spacing in a few places so that all the files pass
Emacs's pre-commit check.

=
Makes sense. Thanks for the explanation.
=C2=A0
<= blockquote class=3D"gmail_quote" style=3D"margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px= #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex">> We never know, we might end up with even= higher stable releases by the
> time emacs 26.1 is released.

I suspect we will, given that 9.0.1 -> 9.0.4 have all been released
since this November.

I don't believe that the target date has yet been set for releasing 2= 6.1. We are currently on the release candidate testing stage of 25.2. So I = will not be surprised if 26.1 get released even 3 months or 6 months from n= ow. Eli? John?
--

Kaushal Modi

--f403045f7f2aa1c769054701761a--