From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Kaushal Subject: Re: [PATCH] Re: What is the best way to set #+DATE to today's date? Date: Fri, 7 Aug 2015 10:01:42 -0400 Message-ID: References: <87bnekmknk.fsf@gmx.us> <86egjg3wx8.fsf@example.com> <87y4hneay5.fsf@nicolasgoaziou.fr> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=089e01537deaac62fd051cb9151a Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:34540) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ZNiE8-0001mp-JE for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Fri, 07 Aug 2015 10:02:34 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ZNiE2-0008Dj-Gj for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Fri, 07 Aug 2015 10:02:28 -0400 Received: from mail-ob0-x233.google.com ([2607:f8b0:4003:c01::233]:33642) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ZNiE2-0008Ck-Be for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Fri, 07 Aug 2015 10:02:22 -0400 Received: by obdeg2 with SMTP id eg2so79771981obd.0 for ; Fri, 07 Aug 2015 07:02:21 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <87y4hneay5.fsf@nicolasgoaziou.fr> List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org To: "Thomas S. Dye" , Fabrice Niessen , emacs-org list , fatkasuvayu+linux@gmail.com --089e01537deaac62fd051cb9151a Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 @Fabrice Thanks for sharing your examples! @Suvayu I tried removing #+DATE: line.. but with that I don't see the date stamp in html exports. The advantage of {{{time(FORMAT)}}} is that I can also control the formatting of the date-time stamp. -- Kaushal Modi On Fri, Aug 7, 2015 at 4:53 AM, Nicolas Goaziou wrote: > Hello, > > Thomas S. Dye writes: > > > A second patch is attached. > > Thank you. > > > From cb30697627afacc8950ef85b839f47d48371f39b Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 > > From: tsdye > > Date: Thu, 6 Aug 2015 12:08:34 -1000 > > Subject: [PATCH 2/2] More date and time macro edits > > I think the commit message is confusing ("more"?). Also, I cannot apply > the patch on maint branch. Could you rebase it on top of that branch? > > Regards, > > -- > Nicolas Goaziou > > --089e01537deaac62fd051cb9151a Content-Type: text/html; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
@Fabrice Thanks for sharing your examples!=

@Suvayu I tried removing #+= DATE: line.. but with that I don't see the date stamp in html exports. = The advantage of {{{time(FORMAT)}}} is that I can also control the formatti= ng of the date-time stamp.


--
Kaushal Modi

On Fri, Aug 7, 2015 at 4:53 AM, Nicolas Goaz= iou <mail@nicolasgoaziou.fr> wrote:
Hello,

Thomas S. Dye <tsd@tsdye.com> wr= ites:

> A second patch is attached.

Thank you.

> From cb30697627afacc8950ef85b839f47d48371f39b Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001=
> From: tsdye <tsd@tsdye.com>=
> Date: Thu, 6 Aug 2015 12:08:34 -1000
> Subject: [PATCH 2/2] More date and time macro edits

I think the commit message is confusing ("more"?). Also, I cannot= apply
the patch on maint branch. Could you rebase it on top of that branch?

Regards,

--
Nicolas Goaziou


--089e01537deaac62fd051cb9151a--