On Jan 3, 2013 8:57 PM, "Bastien" wrote: > > Hi James, > > James Harkins writes: > > > - One should not put symlinks into org-directory, or at least make > > sure the symlink's name is the same as the target. If this is an > > intentional limitation, it should be documented. > > > > - Or, the symlink resolution is not actually necessary and it causes > > problems. In that case, it's a bug that should be fixed. > > > > Which is it? :-) > > I'd say the first one :) Hm, I'd suggest a third possibility then: - There isn't actually a good reason for the restriction and nobody knows why it's done this way, but it's too much trouble to fix for a corner case that's easily worked around. The outcome is the same as the first: document the issue. hjh