From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Fabrice Popineau Subject: Re: Exponents / subscripts Date: Wed, 22 Oct 2014 15:19:07 +0200 Message-ID: References: <87zjcs0yxw.fsf@nicolasgoaziou.fr> <87k33v13g5.fsf@nicolasgoaziou.fr> <8761fenzxi.fsf@gmx.us> <87y4s9mlef.fsf@nicolasgoaziou.fr> <87fveh89wi.fsf@gmx.us> <87ppdkmppl.fsf@nicolasgoaziou.fr> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=e89a8ff1ce221490a8050602cc97 Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:33718) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Xgvp8-0007CT-U0 for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Wed, 22 Oct 2014 09:19:40 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Xgvp3-0005i9-GC for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Wed, 22 Oct 2014 09:19:34 -0400 Received: from mail-oi0-x233.google.com ([2607:f8b0:4003:c06::233]:65142) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Xgvp3-0005hs-8N for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Wed, 22 Oct 2014 09:19:29 -0400 Received: by mail-oi0-f51.google.com with SMTP id h136so2683728oig.38 for ; Wed, 22 Oct 2014 06:19:27 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <87ppdkmppl.fsf@nicolasgoaziou.fr> List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org To: Rasmus , "emacs-orgmode@gnu.org" --e89a8ff1ce221490a8050602cc97 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 2014-10-22 11:13 GMT+02:00 > > > Unfortunately, some users complain about the approximation. OTOH, I'm > pretty sure that most LaTeX users can parse sub/superscript LaTeX code > without any fontification at all. > If there is no easy way to fix it, I may prefer to disable this fontification, because it displays something which is wrong (also the superscript is too small in my opinion, sometimes the character is unreadable). The current \(a^nb^n\) is actually displayed as \(a^{nbn}\) which is misleading. This is what bothered me first. OTOH, I have set up preview of formulas (actually I did it for tikz diagrams) and it works well. It is slower, and I use it for complicated formulas only, but at least it is exact. Fabrice --e89a8ff1ce221490a8050602cc97 Content-Type: text/html; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable


2014-10-22 11:13 GMT+02:00=C2=A0

Unfortunately, some users complain about the approximation. OTOH, I&= #39;m
pretty sure that most LaTeX users can parse sub/superscript LaTeX code
without any fontification at all.

If th= ere is no easy way to fix it, I may prefer to disable this fontification,
because it displays something which is wrong (also the superscript= is too small in my opinion,
sometimes the character is unreadabl= e).

The current \(a^nb^n\) is actually displayed a= s \(a^{nbn}\) which is misleading.=C2=A0

This is w= hat bothered me first.

OTOH, I have set up preview= of formulas (actually I did it for tikz diagrams) and it works well.
=
It is slower, and I use it for complicated formulas only, but at least= it is exact.

Fabrice

--e89a8ff1ce221490a8050602cc97--