From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Fabrice Popineau Subject: Emacs Lisp Depth Date: Tue, 16 Sep 2014 15:01:01 +0200 Message-ID: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=089e0118320e1b1e1f05032e59b2 Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:60633) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1XTsNu-0001kw-QG for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Tue, 16 Sep 2014 09:01:35 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1XTsNq-0007jr-5z for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Tue, 16 Sep 2014 09:01:30 -0400 List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org To: "emacs-orgmode@gnu.org" , Emacs developers --089e0118320e1b1e1f05032e59b2 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Hi, Am I the only one to have hit the bottom of the default max_specpdl_size and max_lisp_eval_depth values ? I had already set max_specpdl_size to 2600 and I had to raise it again. I have an Org file of about 10000 lines, and I am exporting x100 beamer slides and a latex document for about 200 pages . Curious to hear about other reports. Fabrice --089e0118320e1b1e1f05032e59b2 Content-Type: text/html; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Hi,

Am I the only one to have hit the b= ottom of the default max_specpdl_size and max_lisp_eval_depth values ?
I had already set max_specpdl_size to 2600 and I had to raise it agai= n.

I have an Org file of about 10000 lines, and I = am exporting x100 beamer slides and a latex document for about 200 pages .<= /div>

Curious to hear about other reports.
Fabrice
--089e0118320e1b1e1f05032e59b2--