From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Fabrice Popineau Subject: Bibliography Date: Mon, 6 May 2013 16:26:16 +0200 Message-ID: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=047d7b3a7fe6030d9504dc0d7d09 Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:41595) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1UZMNG-0005a7-2O for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Mon, 06 May 2013 10:26:48 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1UZMNC-0005fC-LK for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Mon, 06 May 2013 10:26:41 -0400 Received: from mail-ee0-f50.google.com ([74.125.83.50]:40125) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1UZMNC-0005ey-En for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Mon, 06 May 2013 10:26:38 -0400 Received: by mail-ee0-f50.google.com with SMTP id e50so1827258eek.37 for ; Mon, 06 May 2013 07:26:36 -0700 (PDT) List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org To: "emacs-orgmode@gnu.org" --047d7b3a7fe6030d9504dc0d7d09 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Is it me or is it normal that the: #+Bibliography: foo plain line is not exported by the LaTeX backend? I assume that: \bibliography{foo} \bibliographystyle{plain} is a decent way to handle it. Thanks for any comment. -- Fabrice --047d7b3a7fe6030d9504dc0d7d09 Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1
Is it me or is it normal that the:

#+Bibliography: foo plain

line is not exported by the LaTeX backend?

I assume that:
\bibliography{foo}
\bibliographystyle{plain}
is a decent way to handle it.

Thanks for any comment.

--
Fabrice
--047d7b3a7fe6030d9504dc0d7d09--