From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Asrail Subject: Re: [PATCH] Babel: add results value support to Scala Date: Wed, 17 Oct 2012 10:16:57 -0300 Message-ID: References: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=f46d042dfdb9c8916904cc4115b3 Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:44173) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1TOTUe-0007PU-93 for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Wed, 17 Oct 2012 09:17:09 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1TOTUY-0002uI-Nz for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Wed, 17 Oct 2012 09:17:04 -0400 Received: from mail-pa0-f41.google.com ([209.85.220.41]:45952) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1TOTUY-0002u2-GU for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Wed, 17 Oct 2012 09:16:58 -0400 Received: by mail-pa0-f41.google.com with SMTP id fa10so7968482pad.0 for ; Wed, 17 Oct 2012 06:16:57 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org To: emacs-orgmode@gnu.org --f46d042dfdb9c8916904cc4115b3 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Hi, Could someone please review this patch? On Oct 15, 2012 4:39 PM, "Asrail" wrote: > * lisp/ob-scala.el (org-babel-scala-wrapper-method): Use an scala > block enclosing the submitted code > > The string representing an well formed block was not an Scala > code. I put the string from the user into an block, surrounded by an > call to replace the default output stream. > --f46d042dfdb9c8916904cc4115b3 Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

Hi,

Could someone please review this patch?

On Oct 15, 2012 4:39 PM, "Asrail" <= asrail@gmail.com> wrote:
* lisp/ob-scala.el (org-babel-scala-wrapper-method): Use an scala
block enclosing the submitted code

=A0 =A0 The string representing an well formed block was not an Scala
code. I put the string from the user into an block, surrounded by an
call to replace the default output stream.
--f46d042dfdb9c8916904cc4115b3--