. . . okay, I realize that a viable Latex document has many preliminary commands. Here's a "working" version of my tangled code \documentclass{article} \usepackage{tikz} \usetikzlibrary{trees} \begin{document} \begin{tikzpicture} \node [circle, draw, fill=red!20] at (0,0) {1} child { node [circle, draw, fill=blue!30] {2} child { node [circle, draw, fill=green!30] {3} } child { node [circle, draw, fill=yellow!30] {4} }}; \end{tikzpicture} \end{document} I guess I need to know where to begin to get the "default" org-mode Latex export functionality for Latex babel tangling. But then maybe I'm barking up the wrong tree. One of the hardest things about learning org-mode is finding out what the "best practice" of something really is. On Sun, Apr 26, 2015 at 7:20 PM, Lawrence Bottorff wrote: > I'm following the Latex howto of org-mode babel. Here's the snippet from > the howto I've got in a separate .org file (see bottom of howto page): > > #+LATEX_HEADER: \usepackage{tikz} > > First execute the second code block, to define the convenience macro > and to set the required new variables in ob-latex.el. Then export to > HTML and to pdf to see the tree exported as an SVG image and as > embedded tikz respectively. > > * Tikz test > Here's a tree, exported to both html and pdf. > > #+header: :file (by-backend (html "tree.svg") (t 'nil)) > #+header: :imagemagick > #+header: :results (by-backend (pdf "latex") (t "raw")) > #+header: :tangle yes > #+begin_src latex > \usetikzlibrary{trees} > \begin{tikzpicture} > \node [circle, draw, fill=red!20] at (0,0) {1} > child { node [circle, draw, fill=blue!30] {2} > child { node [circle, draw, fill=green!30] {3} } > child { node [circle, draw, fill=yellow!30] {4} }}; > \end{tikzpicture} > #+end_src > > * COMMENT setup > #+header: :tangle yes > #+begin_src emacs-lisp :results silent > (setq org-babel-latex-htlatex "htlatex") > (defmacro by-backend (&rest body) > `(case (if (boundp 'backend) (org-export-backend-name backend) nil) > ,@body)) > #+end_src > > This doesn't really produce a .svg of the tree as advertised, but > exporting to Latex does produce it just fine. > > My real confusion starts when I try to tangle the babel code blocks. The > C-c C-v t command produces two separate files just fine, a .tex and .el, > but then if I try to Run Latex on the .tex file just by itself it gives an > error. Here's what the org-mode tangle produces: > > \usetikzlibrary{trees} > \begin{tikzpicture} > \node [circle, draw, fill=red!20] at (0,0) {1} > child { node [circle, draw, fill=blue!30] {2} > child { node [circle, draw, fill=green!30] {3} } > child { node [circle, draw, fill=yellow!30] {4} }}; > \end{tikzpicture} > > And here's the error log after I try to run it by itself in Emacs: > > . . .entering extended mode > restricted \write18 enabled. > file:line:error style messages enabled. > %&-line parsing enabled. > **\input prac2.tex > (./prac2.tex > ./prac2.tex:2: Undefined control sequence. > l.2 \usetikzlibrary > {trees} > The control sequence at the end of the top line > of your error message was never \def'ed. If you have > misspelled it (e.g., `\hobx'), type `I' and the correct > spelling (e.g., `I\hbox'). Otherwise just continue, > and I'll forget about whatever was undefined. > Another version (from C-c `) produces this error message: > > ERROR: Undefined control sequence. > > --- TeX said --- > l.2 \usetikzlibrary > {trees} > --- HELP --- > TeX encountered an unknown command name. You probably misspelled the > name. If this message occurs when a LaTeX command is being processed, > the command is probably in the wrong place---for example, the error > can be produced by an \item command that's not inside a list-making > environment. The error can also be caused by a missing \documentclass > command. > > What am I missing here? I'd like to be able to keep my org stuff separate > from the Latex source, which org-mode seems to do nicely. But then it has > to run properly too. . . . > > LB >