Yes, thanks, the :session did the trick. Is that documented somewhere?
Also, it ignored my running MIT Scheme and fired up a Guile REPL in the
next buffer. I guess it's doing something with Geiser, hence, Guile?

On Thu, May 28, 2015 at 3:20 PM, Nick Dokos <ndokos@gmail.com> wrote:

> Lawrence Bottorff <borgauf@gmail.com> writes:
>
> > The MIT scheme repl is running in the next buffer. . .
> >
>
> Did you try it?
>
> --8<---------------cut here---------------start------------->8---
> #+BEGIN_SRC scheme :session foo
>  (define (mydouble x)
>  (+ x x))
> #+END_SRC
>
> #+RESULTS:
>
> doesn't seem to remember from one block to the next. So, after defining
> the code above
>
> #+BEGIN_SRC scheme :session foo
>  (mydouble 5)
> #+END_SRC
>
> #+RESULTS:
> : 10
> --8<---------------cut here---------------end--------------->8---
>
> Without the session, I get
>
> #+RESULTS
> : An error occurred.
>
> instead. This is with guile as the scheme interpreter, but that should
> not make any difference.
>
>
> > On May 28, 2015 2:16 PM, "Nick Dokos" <ndokos@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> >     Lawrence Bottorff <borgauf@gmail.com> writes:
> >
> >     > . . . installed geiser via elpa -- and got some functionality.
> Although a simple thing like
> >     >
> >     > #+BEGIN_SRC scheme
> >     > (define (mydouble x)
> >     > (+ x x))
> >     >   #+END_SRC
> >     >
> >     > doesn't seem to remember from one block to the next. So, after
> defining the code above
> >     >
> >     > #+BEGIN_SRC scheme
> >     > (mydouble 5)
> >     >  #+END_SRC
> >     >
> >     > gives an error, while
> >     >
> >     >  #+BEGIN_SRC scheme
> >     > (define (mysquare x)
> >     >   (* x x))
> >     > (mysquare 5)
> >     >  #+END_SRC
> >     >
> >     >   #+RESULTS:
> >     >   : 25
> >     >
> >     > works. Any way to have it remember like a REPL does?
> >
> >     Use a session?
>
> Nick
>
>
>