Well, at least there is a sane explanation. Ironically, I was also about to
complain about all my loose ">"s getting flagged. So they are related!
Would there be a way to make an exception for < and > inside of actual code
forms? Languages need them for "greater than" and "less than".

On Thu, May 2, 2019 at 4:39 PM Nicolas Goaziou <mail@nicolasgoaziou.fr>
wrote:

> Hello,
>
> Marco Wahl <marcowahlsoft@gmail.com> writes:
>
> > Using < and > as parenthesis in Org is questionable, I think.
>
> In Org syntax, < and > often come in pair (timestamps, some links,
> targets, radio targets). There is at least some interest in the current
> behaviour.
>
> > Also this behavior is not documented AFAICT.
>
> I don't think you can document every single detail. Even if it was
> possible, it wouldn't be desirable.
>
> > What about removing this special?  Or does anyone enjoy this behavior?
>
> This needs to be carefully tested and weighted.
>
> Regards,
>
> --
> Nicolas Goaziou
>
>