From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Brian van den Broek Subject: Re: New logo Date: Mon, 1 Apr 2013 14:28:20 -0400 Message-ID: References: <87hajqjhgy.fsf@bzg.ath.cx> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=bcaec54d448a14524e04d950c955 Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:42149) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1UMjSw-0006mR-QX for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Mon, 01 Apr 2013 14:28:24 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1UMjSv-0005e0-Je for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Mon, 01 Apr 2013 14:28:22 -0400 Received: from mail-ve0-f181.google.com ([209.85.128.181]:63364) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1UMjSv-0005ds-FF for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Mon, 01 Apr 2013 14:28:21 -0400 Received: by mail-ve0-f181.google.com with SMTP id pa12so2837047veb.40 for ; Mon, 01 Apr 2013 11:28:21 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org To: Evan Misshula Cc: Bastien , Emacs-orgmode --bcaec54d448a14524e04d950c955 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 On 1 Apr 2013 14:23, "Evan Misshula" wrote: > > > I did spent a lot of time and energy on deciding this, and this > > is not only me, but also many Org users I've asked, so please do > > not discuss this change. > > Seems like an April fools joke. Of course we will discuss. :-P > > > On Mon, Apr 1, 2013 at 2:16 PM, Brian van den Broek < brian.van.den.broek@gmail.com> wrote: >> Oh, +1. No, strike that. +4 >> >> Best, >> >> Brian vdB That's not in keeping with the spirit of the thing. Knowing allusions (as above) are fine, but overtly pointing it? That's not cricket! Brian vdB --bcaec54d448a14524e04d950c955 Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable


On 1 Apr 2013 14:23, "Evan Misshula" <evanmisshula@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > I did spent a lot of time and energy on deciding this, and this > > is not only me, but also many Org users I've asked, so please= do
> > not discuss this change.
>
> Seems like an April fools joke.=A0 Of course we will discuss. :-P
>
>
> On Mon, Apr 1, 2013 at 2:16 PM, Brian van den Broek <brian.van.den.broek@gmail.com> wr= ote:

<snip>

>> Oh, +1. No, strike that. +4
>>
>> Best,
>>
>> Brian vdB

That's not in keeping with the spirit of the thing. Knowing allusion= s (as above) are fine, but overtly pointing it? That's not cricket!

Brian vdB

--bcaec54d448a14524e04d950c955--