From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Brian van den Broek Subject: Re: Change example timestamps to not occur in headlines Date: Mon, 23 Apr 2012 14:44:28 +0200 Message-ID: References: <87ty0a92it.fsf@gnu.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=14dae9399b97b825cb04be57ffb5 Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:42115) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1SMIdC-0007Ce-Qc for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Mon, 23 Apr 2012 08:44:44 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1SMId6-0006Up-68 for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Mon, 23 Apr 2012 08:44:38 -0400 In-Reply-To: <87ty0a92it.fsf@gnu.org> List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org To: Bastien Cc: emacs-orgmode --14dae9399b97b825cb04be57ffb5 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 On 23 Apr 2012 12:15, "Bastien" wrote: > > Hi Samuel, > > Samuel Wales writes: > > > On 2012-04-20, John Hendy wrote: > >>>>> I've attached a small patch to the documentation that resolves a > >>>>> conflict between the manual's advice not to include timestamps in > >>>>> headlines and some of its examples where it does just that. > > > > Does this advice apply any more? > > Yes it does. > > > Perhaps it shoudl be removed. > > So no... let's stick to the current version of the manual. Hi Bastien and all, I agree that the discouragement of timestamps in headlines should remain in the docs. But I still do think the docs examples should be changed to comply with that advice. I tried twice to send a patch, yet failed to do so in a manner recognized by patchwork. I *think* I know how now, but elected not to send a third attempt. Should I send it once again? Best, Brian vdB --14dae9399b97b825cb04be57ffb5 Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

On 23 Apr 2012 12:15, "Bastien" <bzg@gnu.org> wrote:
>
> Hi Samuel,
>
> Samuel Wales <samologist@gm= ail.com> writes:
>
> > On 2012-04-20, John Hendy <jw.hendy@gmail.com> wrote:
> >>>>> I've attached a small patch to the documentat= ion that resolves a
> >>>>> conflict between the manual's advice not to i= nclude timestamps in
> >>>>> headlines and some of its examples where it does = just that.
> >
> > Does this advice apply any more?
>
> Yes it does.
>
> > Perhaps it shoudl be removed.
>
> So no... let's stick to the current version of the manual.

Hi Bastien and all,

I agree that the discouragement of timestamps in headlines should remain= in the docs.

But I still do think the docs examples should be changed to comply with = that advice. I tried twice to send a patch, yet failed to do so in a manner= recognized by patchwork. I *think* I know how now, but elected not to send= a third attempt. Should I send it once again?

Best,

Brian vdB

--14dae9399b97b825cb04be57ffb5--