On 23 Apr 2012 12:15, "Bastien" <bzg@gnu.org> wrote:
>
> Hi Samuel,
>
> Samuel Wales <samologist@gmail.com> writes:
>
> > On 2012-04-20, John Hendy <jw.hendy@gmail.com> wrote:
> >>>>> I've attached a small patch to the documentation that resolves a
> >>>>> conflict between the manual's advice not to include timestamps in
> >>>>> headlines and some of its examples where it does just that.
> >
> > Does this advice apply any more?
>
> Yes it does.
>
> > Perhaps it shoudl be removed.
>
> So no... let's stick to the current version of the manual.

Hi Bastien and all,

I agree that the discouragement of timestamps in headlines should remain in
the docs.

But I still do think the docs examples should be changed to comply with
that advice. I tried twice to send a patch, yet failed to do so in a manner
recognized by patchwork. I *think* I know how now, but elected not to send
a third attempt. Should I send it once again?

Best,

Brian vdB