From: "Bruce D'Arcus" <firstname.lastname@example.org>
To: "András Simonyi" <email@example.com>
Cc: Ihor Radchenko <firstname.lastname@example.org>,
emacs-orgmode list <email@example.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] oc-csl: Add support for sub-bibliographies
Date: Mon, 25 Jul 2022 14:44:35 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <CAF-FPGNAat8Ewig7M3EZahVvnyB4K2T3JZ78BvV38PDFdiCOfirstname.lastname@example.org> (raw)
On Mon, Jul 25, 2022 at 2:26 PM András Simonyi <email@example.com> wrote:
> Dear All,
> On Sun, 24 Jul 2022 at 09:41, Ihor Radchenko <firstname.lastname@example.org> wrote:
> > Thanks!
> > I have made some changes to the patch, mostly fixing grammar issues (the
> > ones I can notice). I also changed the sub-section from "Bibliography
> > options" to "Bibliography options in "biblatex" and "csl" export processors"
> > See the attached.
> Thanks a lot for the improvements! The only suggested change which I'm
> not sure about is the renaming of the section "Bibliography printing"
> to "Printing bibliography" Neither of them are ideal but it's
> difficult to find a formulation which sounds OK and is noncommittal
> regarding the number of bibliographies (a single one vs. several). Of
> the two, I feel that "Printing bibliography" is slightly worse because
> of the missing determiner before "bibliography", maybe "Printing
> bibliographies" would be better? Admittedly, as a non-native user of
> English my intuitions do not count for much, so it'd be nice to hear
> the opinion of some of the native speaker list members.
I'm a native speaker.
I think "Bibliography printing" sounds like the best option, since it
doesn't really preclude there are multiple.
"Printing bibliographies" would also be OK.
I don't think "Printing bibliography" really works.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2022-07-25 18:46 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 17+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2022-07-11 22:13 [PATCH] oc-csl: Add support for sub-bibliographies András Simonyi
2022-07-16 8:44 ` Ihor Radchenko
2022-07-20 22:03 ` András Simonyi
2022-07-21 6:06 ` András Simonyi
2022-07-23 4:00 ` Ihor Radchenko
2022-07-23 20:10 ` András Simonyi
2022-07-24 7:42 ` Ihor Radchenko
2022-07-25 18:18 ` András Simonyi
2022-07-25 18:44 ` Bruce D'Arcus [this message]
2022-07-26 6:23 ` Fraga, Eric
2022-07-26 5:38 ` Ihor Radchenko
2022-07-28 21:36 ` András Simonyi
2022-07-29 1:33 ` Ihor Radchenko
2022-07-29 19:51 ` András Simonyi
2022-07-31 2:33 ` Ihor Radchenko
2022-08-02 10:53 ` András Simonyi
2022-07-31 2:28 ` Ihor Radchenko
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
List information: https://www.orgmode.org/
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
Code repositories for project(s) associated with this public inbox
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).