From: "Bruce D'Arcus" <firstname.lastname@example.org>
To: John Kitchin <email@example.com>
Cc: org-mode-email <firstname.lastname@example.org>
Subject: Re: should a BIBLIOGRAPHY keyword supercede org-cite-global-bibliography?
Date: Mon, 19 Jul 2021 12:18:19 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <CAF-FPGMkP6w7W-=heNWihDURmYqeBwHTpZTmNFcXUvULE491zA@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
I was wondering about this the other day too, and am not sure.
It can actually be a problem, and has been for me, if you're mixing
export processors; like biblatex, and CSL (which is best to use with
So I definitely see a downside currently, and can't think of a problem
in changing this.
If someone else can, maybe it should be configurable?
Along these lines, it might be nice if we could choose which global
file(s) or extensions for which processor.
On Mon, Jul 19, 2021 at 12:07 PM John Kitchin <email@example.com> wrote:
> The org-cite-list-bibliography-files function in oc.el returns a combination of file-local files and the bibfiles defined in org-cite-global-bibliography.
> It seems like that should not be the case, i.e. if you define BIBLIOGRAPHY keywords it means you do not want to use the ones in org-cite-global-bibliography. Is there a scenario where the union of those makes sense?
> Professor John Kitchin (he/him/his)
> Doherty Hall A207F
> Department of Chemical Engineering
> Carnegie Mellon University
> Pittsburgh, PA 15213
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-07-19 16:18 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-07-19 16:07 should a BIBLIOGRAPHY keyword supercede org-cite-global-bibliography? John Kitchin
2021-07-19 16:18 ` Bruce D'Arcus [this message]
2021-07-20 0:01 ` Vikas Rawal
2021-07-20 0:52 ` Thomas S. Dye
2021-07-20 1:42 ` Bruce D'Arcus
2021-07-20 8:03 ` Eric S Fraga
2021-07-19 17:29 CHARPENTIER Emmanuel via General discussions about Org-mode.
2021-07-19 17:40 ` Bruce D'Arcus
2021-07-19 17:54 ` John Kitchin
2021-07-19 18:06 ` Bruce D'Arcus
2021-07-19 18:07 ` CHARPENTIER Emmanuel via General discussions about Org-mode.
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
List information: https://www.orgmode.org/
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
Code repositories for project(s) associated with this public inbox
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).