I wanted to test the (new|future) citation abilities of =Org= ; I tested what is available in =citeproc-org= with the =org-ref} syntax the latter supports. However, I also wanted to test what is available with the "new" syntax planned for introduction in =Org=. According to https://github.com/andras-simonyi/citeproc-org#org-mode-citations-and-bibliography-using-the-wip-cite-syntax , this is only available on the =wip-cite= development branch. However, my freshly updated git clone (of https://code.orgmode.org/bzg/org-mode.git ) doesn't have such a branch. Where should I get this code ? Related question : is there an ETA of these new abilities in =Org= ? -- Emmanuel Charpentier
Hello, Emmanuel Charpentier <emm.charpentier@free.fr> writes: > I wanted to test the (new|future) citation abilities of =Org= ; I > tested what is available in =citeproc-org= with the =org-ref} syntax > the latter supports. > > However, I also wanted to test what is available with the "new" syntax > planned for introduction in =Org=. Great! > According to > https://github.com/andras-simonyi/citeproc-org#org-mode-citations-and-bibliography-using-the-wip-cite-syntax > , this is only available on the =wip-cite= development branch.> > However, my freshly updated git clone > (of https://code.orgmode.org/bzg/org-mode.git ) doesn't have such a > branch. The branch is "wip-cite-new". > Where should I get this code ? For example, here: https://code.orgmode.org/bzg/org-mode/src/wip-cite-new > Related question : is there an ETA of these new abilities in =Org= ? I would appreciate some alpha-testing first, but I would say the code is already good enough for inclusion at this point. I.e., there are a couple of points open for discussion, but no blocker. Please let me know how it goes! Regards, -- Nicolas Goaziou
Le samedi 26 juin 2021 à 10:35 +0200, Nicolas Goaziou a écrit : [ Snip... ] > > Where should I get this code ? > > For example, here: > > https://code.orgmode.org/bzg/org-mode/src/wip-cite-new Thank you very much ! Is there a similar repository for the futire org-contrib package ? I depend very much o some libraries currently in (or using) org-plus- contrib... [ Re-snip.. ] > Please let me know how it goes! I will certainly do : citations andcross-reference are crucuial features of academic/scientific writing, which is the whole point of my use of org-mode... Sincerely yours, -- Emmanuel Charpentier
On Saturday, 26 Jun 2021 at 10:35, Nicolas Goaziou wrote: > Emmanuel Charpentier <emm.charpentier@free.fr> writes: >> Related question : is there an ETA of these new abilities in =Org= ? > > I would appreciate some alpha-testing first, but I would say the code is > already good enough for inclusion at this point. I.e., there are > a couple of points open for discussion, but no blocker. As a data point, I can say that I have been using the cite branch for writing a couple of documents the past week or two, documents that had to be exported to ODT (yech) and needed citations. It seems to be working well. Thank you! It would be nice to have this merged with master so that I can have the rest of my workflow at hand; e.g. I have ivy-bibtex inserting links to citations automatically but I have to change the format of what it inserts depending on which version of org I am using... Thank you, eric PS -I still do not understand why the syntax is not [[cite:...]] (which is what I use in master). But I don't want to re-open the discussion. ;-) -- : Eric S Fraga via Emacs 28.0.50, Org release_9.4.6-571-gc591be : Latest paper written in org: https://arxiv.org/abs/2106.05096
On Mon, Jun 28, 2021 at 7:07 AM Eric S Fraga <e.fraga@ucl.ac.uk> wrote: > It would be nice to have this merged with master so that I can have the > rest of my workflow at hand; e.g. I have ivy-bibtex inserting links to > citations automatically but I have to change the format of what it > inserts depending on which version of org I am using... FWIW, I added a function to format org-cite here, which you can use with ivy-bibtex also. https://github.com/bdarcus/bibtex-actions/blob/main/bibtex-actions.el#L200 There were a few UI decisions I made that will need real world testing to see if they were right. Bruce
On Monday, 28 Jun 2021 at 08:09, Bruce D'Arcus wrote: > FWIW, I added a function to format org-cite here, which you can use > with ivy-bibtex also. Thank you. Very comprehensive. Mine is much simpler! But I have two versions, one for the master branch and one for the wip-cite-new branch and I have to keep re-evaluating the code when I switch org branches which is why I'm keen to have the branches merged. ;-) -- : Eric S Fraga via Emacs 28.0.50, Org release_9.4.6-571-gc591be : Latest paper written in org: https://arxiv.org/abs/2106.05096
On Mon, Jun 28, 2021 at 8:22 AM Eric S Fraga <e.fraga@ucl.ac.uk> wrote:
>
> On Monday, 28 Jun 2021 at 08:09, Bruce D'Arcus wrote:
> > FWIW, I added a function to format org-cite here, which you can use
> > with ivy-bibtex also.
>
> Thank you. Very comprehensive. Mine is much simpler! But I have two
> versions, one for the master branch and one for the wip-cite-new branch
> and I have to keep re-evaluating the code when I switch org branches
> which is why I'm keen to have the branches merged. ;-)
Oh, for sure; I agree it'd be good to get this merged for those of us
that need to get academic work done now!
Bruce
On Monday, 28 Jun 2021 at 08:26, Bruce D'Arcus wrote: > Oh, for sure; I agree it'd be good to get this merged for those of us > that need to get academic work done now! Especially now that (at least for me) all teaching activities are mostly over and done with and I can concentrate on my research. :-) -- : Eric S Fraga via Emacs 28.0.50, Org release_9.4.6-571-gc591be : Latest paper written in org: https://arxiv.org/abs/2106.05096