Hello Nicolas and Jambunathan, Thanks again for your responses to my questions. I report some success and some "in process." 1. Stylesheet attachment (with #+STYLE:) works fine now. 2. Your special string example (replace-regexp-in-string), Nicolas, as well as the better entity solution (\trade), both work splendidly. I'm looking now at three issues. Please let me know what I can/should change. Thanks again for this new export engine! Cheers, -BC Testing: "M-x org-export-dispatch h" Org-mode: 7.8.11 (release_7.8.11-18-g244331) Emacs: 24.1.50.1 Windows 7 -------------------------------------------------- 1. UTF-8 XML Encoding In my init.el: (setq org-e-html-coding-system 'utf-8) But first line of test.html: In test.org: org-e-html-coding-system is a variable defined in `org-e-html.el'. Its value is utf-8 Original value was nil Documentation: Coding system for HTML export. Use `org-export-coding-system' as the default value. And: buffer-file-coding-system is a variable defined in `C source code'. Its value is utf-8-dos Local in buffer 6-test.org; global value is utf-8-dos -------------------------------------------------- 2a. Internal HTML links (#) Neither links nor destinations make it into the html. This: "an internal section link [[#directors][Directors]]." becomes: "an internal section link: Directors. Was expecting (without italics): ""an internal section link: Directors" -------------------- 2b. This target: # <> * A First Section becomes:

A First Section

Was expecting:

A First Section

-------------------------------------------------- 3. Image and file prefixes are as they were. This (image): [[/sites/a.png]] becomes: And this (file): [[/sites/my-file][My link]] becomes: My link I'd love an option to "change it not" for both, so that neither "g:" nor "file://g:" is added to "/...". I could strip them out, after exporting, but I think this is an option that others would also value. (External links, to an "http://...", work fine.) ------------------[end]--------------------------- On Sun, May 27, 2012 at 9:00 AM, William Crandall wrote: > Hello Nicolas and Jambunathan, > > Many thanks, to you both, for such quick and detailed responses! > >