Hi,

On Tue, Nov 22, 2016 at 3:08 AM, Sebastien Vauban <sva-news@mygooglest.com> wrote:
>
> Yasushi SHOJI <yashi@atmark-techno.com> writes:
> > ---- >8 ---- cut ---- >8 ----
> > * DONE org
> > DEADLINE: [2016-01-07 Thu 17:39]
> >
> > SCHEDULED: <2015-09-29 Tue .+1w>
> >
> > ---- >8 ---- cut ---- >8 ----
>
> A shoot in the dark: replace the [] by <>.
>
> [] for DEADLINE does not make much sense...

thanks for your comment.

chainging the inactive timestamp to active doesn't seem

to change the behavior.

even with an inactive time stamp, it's not a good excuse

to show a closed entry, isn't it?

yashi