Hi,

On Tue, Nov 22, 2016 at 3:08 AM, Sebastien Vauban <sva-news@mygooglest.com>
wrote:
>
> Yasushi SHOJI <yashi@atmark-techno.com> writes:
> > ---- >8 ---- cut ---- >8 ----
> > * DONE org
> >   DEADLINE: [2016-01-07 Thu 17:39]
> >
> >   SCHEDULED: <2015-09-29 Tue .+1w>
> >
> > ---- >8 ---- cut ---- >8 ----
>
> A shoot in the dark: replace the [] by <>.
>
> [] for DEADLINE does not make much sense...

thanks for your comment.
chainging the inactive timestamp to active doesn't seem
to change the behavior.

even with an inactive time stamp, it's not a good excuse
to show a closed entry, isn't it?
-- 
            yashi