From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Carsten Dominik Subject: =?UTF-8?B?UmU6IEJ1Zzogb3JnLXRhYmxlLWluc2VydC1jb2x1bW4gZWRpdHMg?= =?UTF-8?B?Zm9ybXVsYXMgd3JvbmdseSBbOS4zIChyZWxlYXNlXzkuMyBAIC91c3IvbG9j?= =?UTF-8?B?YWwvQ2VsbGFyL2VtYWNzLXBsdXMvSEVBRC05ZDM4NTY0L3NoYXJlL2VtYWNz?= =?UTF-8?B?LzI4LjAuNTAvbGlzcC9vcmcvKV0=?= Date: Wed, 1 Apr 2020 20:54:38 +0200 Message-ID: References: <84eet9bk0y.fsf@gmail.com> <87v9mlh1hg.fsf@kyleam.com> <878sjghl6m.fsf@ucl.ac.uk> <87369o62n1.fsf@nicolasgoaziou.fr> <875zekfuce.fsf@ucl.ac.uk> <87k1304776.fsf@nicolasgoaziou.fr> <84blobw0u8.fsf@gmail.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="0000000000004a6b5d05a23f3842" Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:57414) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1jJiVs-00048d-R7 for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Wed, 01 Apr 2020 14:54:57 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1jJiVr-0003Cu-Tc for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Wed, 01 Apr 2020 14:54:56 -0400 Received: from mail-ed1-f42.google.com ([209.85.208.42]:44241) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1jJiVr-0003Aj-NA for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Wed, 01 Apr 2020 14:54:55 -0400 Received: by mail-ed1-f42.google.com with SMTP id i16so1136792edy.11 for ; Wed, 01 Apr 2020 11:54:55 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <84blobw0u8.fsf@gmail.com> List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Sender: "Emacs-orgmode" To: Marco Wahl Cc: org-mode list --0000000000004a6b5d05a23f3842 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Hi Marco, thank you for the reply. For the record, I am in favor of the old workings, as described by Eric. It is more consistent in several ways. Carsten On Wed, Apr 1, 2020 at 7:52 PM Marco Wahl wrote: > Hi Carsten, > > > I just pulled the lates master, and I think the creation of a new column > > has not been set back to the way it used to be, even though Nicolas > agreed > > to do so. Am I missing something? > > As I understood, we practice some patience now to see if someone votes > for keeping the current behavior. And then act according to the > discussion (or non-discussion.) > > > Best regards, > -- Marco > --0000000000004a6b5d05a23f3842 Content-Type: text/html; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Hi Marco,

thank you for the reply.=C2= =A0 For the record, I am in favor of the old workings, as described by Eric= .=C2=A0 It is more consistent in several ways.

Car= sten

On Wed, Apr 1, 2020 at 7:52 PM Marco Wahl <marcowahlsoft@gmail.com> wrote:
Hi Carsten,

> I just pulled the lates master, and I think the creation of a new colu= mn
> has not been set back to the way it used to be, even though Nicolas ag= reed
> to do so.=C2=A0 Am I missing something?

As I understood, we practice some patience now to see if someone votes
for keeping the current behavior.=C2=A0 And then act according to the
discussion (or non-discussion.)


Best regards,
-- Marco
--0000000000004a6b5d05a23f3842--