From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Carsten Dominik Subject: Re: Exponential numbers in latex table export Date: Fri, 30 Mar 2018 19:52:56 +0200 Message-ID: References: <17107066.dRKVHBuYob@krailli.fritz.box> <87fu4kqusq.fsf@nicolasgoaziou.fr> <65b629f4-810d-7ba5-1c8b-0c25e76c34cd@gmx.de> <877epuprl9.fsf@nicolasgoaziou.fr> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="f403045c55ec30c4190568a4eaae" Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:53225) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1f1yDH-00054r-5B for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Fri, 30 Mar 2018 13:53:20 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1f1yDG-0003JC-4R for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Fri, 30 Mar 2018 13:53:19 -0400 Received: from mail-wm0-x22a.google.com ([2a00:1450:400c:c09::22a]:53928) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1f1yDF-0003Iu-UM for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Fri, 30 Mar 2018 13:53:18 -0400 Received: by mail-wm0-x22a.google.com with SMTP id p9so16550457wmc.3 for ; Fri, 30 Mar 2018 10:53:17 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <877epuprl9.fsf@nicolasgoaziou.fr> List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: "Emacs-orgmode" To: Nicolas Goaziou Cc: Julius Dittmar , org-mode list --f403045c55ec30c4190568a4eaae Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Hi Nicolas, let's make it nil. - Carsten On Thu, Mar 29, 2018 at 10:14 PM, Nicolas Goaziou wrote: > Hello, > > Carsten Dominik writes: > > > On Thu, Mar 29, 2018 at 5:51 PM, Julius Dittmar > > wrote: > > > >> > >> On 29.03.2018 10:37, Carsten Dominik wrote: > >> > >>> I believe I ended up using this because I wanted something that is not > >>> dependent on having math-mode in the table column. What I would have > >>> really preferred is "%s\times10^{%s}", but that is less stable because > >>> you need then to know if the column will have math-mode or not. > >>> > >> > >> How about \ensuremath{%s\times10^{%s}} ? > > > > > > That would do the trick, yes. > > So, what should be the default value : > > \ensuremath{%s\times10^{%s}} > > or > > nil > > I don't mind either way. > > Regards, > > -- > Nicolas Goaziou > --f403045c55ec30c4190568a4eaae Content-Type: text/html; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Hi Nicolas,

let's make it nil.

- Carsten

On Thu, Mar 29, 2018 at 10:14 PM, Nicolas Goaziou = <mail@nicolasgoaziou.fr> wrote:
Hello,

Carsten Dominik <dominik@uva.nl>= ; writes:

> On Thu, Mar 29, 2018 at 5:51 PM, Julius Dittmar <Julius.Dittmar@gmx.de>
> wrote:
>
>>
>> On 29.03.2018 10:37, Carsten Dominik wrote:
>>
>>> I believe I ended up using this because I wanted something tha= t is not
>>> dependent on having math-mode in the table column.=C2=A0 What = I would have
>>> really preferred is "%s\times10^{%s}", but that is l= ess stable because
>>> you need then to know if the column will have math-mode or not= .
>>>
>>
>> How about \ensuremath{%s\times10^{%s}} ?
>
>
> That would do the trick, yes.

So, what should be the default value :

=C2=A0 \ensuremath{%s\times10^{%s}}

or

=C2=A0 nil

I don't mind either way.

Regards,

--
Nicolas Goaziou

--f403045c55ec30c4190568a4eaae--