From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Allen Li <darkfeline@felesatra.moe>
Subject: Re: Bug: Special property ITEM without stars [9.1.14]
Date: Fri, 14 Dec 2018 12:58:04 -0800
Message-ID: <CADbSrJx5-TP065kEjfxEb3VQAf4vMOb2sQaZ=ybV0_g7vRDC6g@mail.gmail.com>
References: <CADbSrJy2UUdbSnyRk2Dp2Aqpfvv6aPVfnE_5rcavBOq-ZdE8fA@mail.gmail.com>
	<87k1kqjk1q.fsf@nicolasgoaziou.fr>
	<CADbSrJxCQnF7=iPjQKh+cswc5PrHLcsCCHBtswez6re79J3tXQ@mail.gmail.com>
	<CADbSrJwbTHRuToBXUtypoT-sGk1X-ML6ZXyyFtyysDdPZbf3Dw@mail.gmail.com>
	<87r2eu90zm.fsf@nicolasgoaziou.fr>
	<CADbSrJxv+svikW-vVi04S65aGROiesfALR2gRdmPu5sNsJJ0hw@mail.gmail.com>
	<87pnu6itli.fsf@nicolasgoaziou.fr>
	<CADbSrJzXN01Enc72QqDeOicdTyEVMFznMTBPCYSVwfcgL_kTDg@mail.gmail.com>
	<87mup9zek1.fsf@norang.ca>
	<CADbSrJy3j6_dYq2fiK1fHd6HrGAeQVwnd3atUsX053rL8cf0RA@mail.gmail.com>
	<87imzwyy3s.fsf@norang.ca>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Return-path: <emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>
Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:34547)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <darkfeline@felesatra.moe>) id 1gXuXT-0005sB-RK
	for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Fri, 14 Dec 2018 15:58:28 -0500
Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <darkfeline@felesatra.moe>) id 1gXuXT-00052q-0a
	for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Fri, 14 Dec 2018 15:58:27 -0500
Received: from mail-it1-x12c.google.com ([2607:f8b0:4864:20::12c]:37006)
	by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16)
	(Exim 4.71) (envelope-from <darkfeline@felesatra.moe>)
	id 1gXuXS-000520-Mq
	for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Fri, 14 Dec 2018 15:58:26 -0500
Received: by mail-it1-x12c.google.com with SMTP id b5so11518011iti.2
	for <emacs-orgmode@gnu.org>; Fri, 14 Dec 2018 12:58:26 -0800 (PST)
In-Reply-To: <87imzwyy3s.fsf@norang.ca>
List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." <emacs-orgmode.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/options/emacs-orgmode>,
	<mailto:emacs-orgmode-request@gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/emacs-orgmode/>
List-Post: <mailto:emacs-orgmode@gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:emacs-orgmode-request@gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-orgmode>,
	<mailto:emacs-orgmode-request@gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
Sender: "Emacs-orgmode"
	<emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>
To: Bernt Hansen <bernt@norang.ca>
Cc: Org Mode List <emacs-orgmode@gnu.org>

On Fri, Dec 14, 2018 at 6:36 AM Bernt Hansen <bernt@norang.ca> wrote:
>
>
> In my custom agenda view for Projects I set
>     (org-tags-match-list-sublevels 'indented)

Good to know, although I see that setting
org-tags-match-list-sublevels to anything other than t is
semi-obsolete.

However, we are talking mostly about how the columns view in the
agenda works, not the agenda itself.

It is odd from a user standpoint that the agenda view deliberately
hides the hierarchy, while the column view adds the hierarchy back in.

Perhaps the stars should only be shown if
org-tags-match-list-sublevels is set to indented, so that the agenda
view matches
the column view with respect to showing hierarchy?  I personally stand
by Org mode's default stance that there's no point in
 showing hierarchy in agenda view.  Some people like Bernt have
workflows that do use hierarchy in agenda view, and that's fine.
But let us be consistent about it.