From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Steffan Iverson Subject: Re: mis-alignment in org-tables with Tibetan characters Date: Tue, 4 Feb 2014 16:00:54 -0800 Message-ID: References: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=047d7bdc781095612404f19d7446 Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:43576) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1WApvZ-00071t-DB for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Tue, 04 Feb 2014 19:01:18 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1WApvY-0001lr-6u for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Tue, 04 Feb 2014 19:01:17 -0500 Received: from mail-qc0-x22f.google.com ([2607:f8b0:400d:c01::22f]:37905) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1WApvY-0001lm-0G for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Tue, 04 Feb 2014 19:01:16 -0500 Received: by mail-qc0-f175.google.com with SMTP id x13so14774065qcv.20 for ; Tue, 04 Feb 2014 16:01:15 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org To: Michael Brand Cc: Org Mode --047d7bdc781095612404f19d7446 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64 TWljaGFlbCwgdGhhdCB0ZXN0IGNhc2UgeW91IHN1Z2dlc3QgZG9lcyBpbmRlZWQgY2F1c2UgdGhl IHNhbWUgc3BhY2luZw0KcHJvYmxlbS4gU28gdGhpcyBpc24ndCBhIHByb2JsZW0gZnJvbSB0aGUg dm93ZWwgc3RhY2tpbmcgaW4gVGliZXRhbiwNCmJlY2F1c2Ugb2YgdGhlIHR5cGUgb2YgZm9udCBp dCBpcz8gU29ycnksIGdlbmVyYWxseSBuZXcgdG8gRW1hY3Mgc28gSSdtIG5vdA0Kc3VyZSBob3cg dG8gbW92ZSBmb3J3YXJkIHdpdGggdGhhdCBpbnNpZ2h0Lg0KDQoNCk9uIFR1ZSwgRmViIDQsIDIw MTQgYXQgMTA6MTMgQU0sIE1pY2hhZWwgQnJhbmQNCjxtaWNoYWVsLmNoLmJyYW5kQGdtYWlsLmNv bT53cm90ZToNCg0KPiBIaSBTdGVmZmFuDQo+DQo+IE9uIE1vbiwgRmViIDMsIDIwMTQgYXQgNjoz MyBBTSwgU3RlZmZhbiBJdmVyc29uDQo+IDxzdGVmZmFuLml2ZXJzb25AZ21haWwuY29tPiB3cm90 ZToNCj4gPiBTY3JlZW5zaG90OiBodHRwOi8vb2k1OS50aW55cGljLmNvbS9sejg5My5qcGcNCj4N Cj4gSnVkZ2luZyBmcm9tIGUuIGcuIHRoaXMgcGFydA0KPiB8IOC9ouC+kOC9tOC9puC8iyAgfCBy a3VzIHwNCj4gfCDgvYLgvabgvbzgvabgvIsgfCBnc29zIHwNCj4gaW4geW91ciBzY3JlZW5zaG90 IG15IHNwZWN1bGF0aW9uIGlzIHRoYXQgeW91IGdldCBnbHlwaHMgZnJvbSBub3Qgb25seSB5b3Vy DQo+IGRlZmF1bHQgbW9ub3NwYWNlIGZvbnQgYnV0IGFsc28gZnJvbSBvdGhlciAobWF5YmUgdmFy aWFibGUgd2lkdGgpIGZvbnQocykuDQo+IEVpdGhlciBiZWNhdXNlIHNvbWUgZ2x5cGhzIGFyZSBu b3QgYXZhaWxhYmxlIGluIHlvdXIgZGVmYXVsdCBtb25vc3BhY2UgZm9udA0KPiBvciBhcmUgbm90 IHVzZWQgZHVlIHRvIGFuIGluY29tcGxldGUgY29uZmlndXJhdGlvbiB3aXRoIHNldC1mb250c2V0 LWZvbnQuDQo+DQo+IEZvciBhIGRpYWdub3NpcyBpbiB0aGlzIGRpcmVjdGlvbiBJIHdvdWxkIGNo ZWNrIHRoZSBhbGlnbm1lbnQgb2YgInwiIGFmdGVyDQo+IHNvbWUgY2hhcmFjdGVycyBqdXN0IHJl cGVhdGVkIGxpa2UgaGVyZToNCj4NCj4geHh4eHh4eHh4eHwNCj4g4LyL4LyL4LyL4LyL4LyL4LyL 4LyL4LyL4LyL4LyLfA0KPiDgvYLgvYLgvYLgvYLgvYLgvYLgvYLgvYLgvYLgvYJ8DQo+IOC9ouC9 ouC9ouC9ouC9ouC9ouC9ouC9ouC9ouC9onwNCj4g4L2m4L2m4L2m4L2m4L2m4L2m4L2m4L2m4L2m 4L2mfA0KPiDgvbTgvbTgvbTgvbTgvbTgvbTgvbTgvbTgvbTgvbR8DQo+IOC9vOC9vOC9vOC9vOC9 vOC9vOC9vOC9vOC9vOC9vHwNCj4g4L6Q4L6Q4L6Q4L6Q4L6Q4L6Q4L6Q4L6Q4L6Q4L6QfA0KPiB4 eHh4eHh4eHh4fA0KPiDiiJ7iiJ7iiJ7iiJ7iiJ7iiJ7iiJ7iiJ7iiJ7iiJ58DQo+DQo+IE1pY2hh ZWwNCj4NCg== --047d7bdc781095612404f19d7446 Content-Type: text/html; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Michael, that test case you suggest does indeed cause the = same spacing problem. So this isn't a problem from the vowel stacking i= n Tibetan, because of the type of font it is? Sorry, generally new to Emacs= so I'm not sure how to move forward with that insight.


On Tue,= Feb 4, 2014 at 10:13 AM, Michael Brand <michael.ch.brand@gmail.c= om> wrote:
Hi Steffan

On Mon, Feb 3, 2014 at 6:33 AM, Steffan Iverson
<steffan.iverson@gmail.com<= /a>> wrote:
> Screenshot: http://oi59.tinypic.com/lz893.jpg

Judging from e. g. this part
| =E0=BD=A2=E0=BE=90=E0=BD=B4=E0=BD=A6=E0=BC=8B =C2=A0| rkus |
| =E0=BD=82=E0=BD=A6=E0=BD=BC=E0=BD=A6=E0=BC=8B | gsos |
in your screenshot my speculation is that you get glyphs from not only your=
default monospace font but also from other (maybe variable width) font(s).<= br> Either because some glyphs are not available in your default monospace font=
or are not used due to an incomplete configuration with set-fontset-font.
For a diagnosis in this direction I would check the alignment of "|&qu= ot; after
some characters just repeated like here:

xxxxxxxxxx|
=E0=BC=8B=E0=BC=8B=E0=BC=8B=E0=BC=8B=E0=BC=8B=E0=BC=8B=E0=BC=8B=E0=BC=8B=E0= =BC=8B=E0=BC=8B|
=E0=BD=82=E0=BD=82=E0=BD=82=E0=BD=82=E0=BD=82=E0=BD=82=E0=BD=82=E0=BD=82=E0= =BD=82=E0=BD=82|
=E0=BD=A2=E0=BD=A2=E0=BD=A2=E0=BD=A2=E0=BD=A2=E0=BD=A2=E0=BD=A2=E0=BD=A2=E0= =BD=A2=E0=BD=A2|
=E0=BD=A6=E0=BD=A6=E0=BD=A6=E0=BD=A6=E0=BD=A6=E0=BD=A6=E0=BD=A6=E0=BD=A6=E0= =BD=A6=E0=BD=A6|
=E0=BD=B4=E0=BD=B4=E0=BD=B4=E0=BD=B4=E0=BD=B4=E0=BD=B4=E0=BD=B4=E0=BD=B4=E0= =BD=B4=E0=BD=B4|
=E0=BD=BC=E0=BD=BC=E0=BD=BC=E0=BD=BC=E0=BD=BC=E0=BD=BC=E0=BD=BC=E0=BD=BC=E0= =BD=BC=E0=BD=BC|
=E0=BE=90=E0=BE=90=E0=BE=90=E0=BE=90=E0=BE=90=E0=BE=90=E0=BE=90=E0=BE=90=E0= =BE=90=E0=BE=90|
xxxxxxxxxx|
=E2=88=9E=E2=88=9E=E2=88=9E=E2=88=9E=E2=88=9E=E2=88=9E=E2=88=9E=E2=88=9E=E2= =88=9E=E2=88=9E|

Michael

--047d7bdc781095612404f19d7446--