From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: York Zhao Subject: Re: Patch for testing `org-open-at-point' Date: Sat, 31 May 2014 21:12:13 -0400 Message-ID: References: <878urc0zmw.fsf@bzg.ath.cx> <874n1ryeq1.fsf@bzg.ath.cx> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary=bcaec51a8bd20778ff04fabbf87e Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:34674) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1WquJs-0007XB-6B for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Sat, 31 May 2014 21:12:17 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1WquJr-0005PI-4Q for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Sat, 31 May 2014 21:12:16 -0400 In-Reply-To: List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org To: Bastien Cc: emacs-orgmode --bcaec51a8bd20778ff04fabbf87e Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Hi Bastien, Thank you very much for implementing this. Really appreciated. So do you think it is a good idea to add my test (the patch) now for testing this? For your convenience, I've attached again in this message the same patch I had sent on April 10. Thanks, York On Sun, Apr 20, 2014 at 3:56 PM, York Zhao wrote: > Hi Bastien, > > I apologize that I missed your reply, I discovered it until now when I was > checking the replies in the "Sent" folder. > >> The question is this: are we fine handling raw links in properties, >> or do we also need Org links (e.g. bracket links) there? > > To me, raw link is hardly useful because too often the web link is really long, > in which case the bracket link acts like a way of abstraction. > > Thank you very much for considering this fix. > > On Thu, Apr 17, 2014 at 2:48 PM, Bastien wrote: >> Hi York, >> >> York Zhao writes: >> >>> * Peter >>> :PROPERTIES: >>> :ADDRESS: xxx xxx xxxx xxxx >>> :HOME_PHONE: xxx xxx xxx >>> :WORK_PHONE: xxx xxx xxx >>> :URL: www.foo.bar >>> :END: >> >> The question is this: are we fine handling raw links in properties, >> or do we also need Org links (e.g. bracket links) there? >> >> Speaking for me, raw links is enough, and this is what I plan to >> implement. But maybe other users have existing use-cases for Org >> links there, I don't know. >> >> -- >> Bastien --bcaec51a8bd20778ff04fabbf87e Content-Type: text/x-diff; charset=US-ASCII; name="0001-test-org-element-Add-test-for-org-open-at-point-with.patch" Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="0001-test-org-element-Add-test-for-org-open-at-point-with.patch" Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64 X-Attachment-Id: f_hvvnlmcw0 RnJvbSBkZjA3ODgxMzRhMTZiYWE5NzYyNjE2NjM3YzBmZTdmNTY4ZTNlNjNlIE1vbiBTZXAgMTcg MDA6MDA6MDAgMjAwMQpGcm9tOiBZb3JrIFpoYW8gPGd0ZHBsYXRmb3JtQGdtYWlsLmNvbT4KRGF0 ZTogVGh1LCAxMCBBcHIgMjAxNCAyMToyMToxNSAtMDQwMApTdWJqZWN0OiBbUEFUQ0hdIHRlc3Qt b3JnLWVsZW1lbnQ6IEFkZCB0ZXN0IGZvciBgb3JnLW9wZW4tYXQtcG9pbnQnIHdpdGggbGluawog YmVpbmcgaGVhZGluZyBwcm9wZXJ0eS4KCi0tLQogdGVzdGluZy9saXNwL3Rlc3Qtb3JnLWVsZW1l bnQuZWwgfCA5ICsrKysrKysrKwogMSBmaWxlIGNoYW5nZWQsIDkgaW5zZXJ0aW9ucygrKQoKZGlm ZiAtLWdpdCBhL3Rlc3RpbmcvbGlzcC90ZXN0LW9yZy1lbGVtZW50LmVsIGIvdGVzdGluZy9saXNw L3Rlc3Qtb3JnLWVsZW1lbnQuZWwKaW5kZXggNTc2ZTNkMy4uOGNmY2VhYyAxMDA2NDQKLS0tIGEv dGVzdGluZy9saXNwL3Rlc3Qtb3JnLWVsZW1lbnQuZWwKKysrIGIvdGVzdGluZy9saXNwL3Rlc3Qt b3JnLWVsZW1lbnQuZWwKQEAgLTE0NjEsNiArMTQ2MSwxNSBAQCBlXntpXFxwaX0rMT0wCiAJICAg IChzZWFyY2gtZm9yd2FyZCAiZmlsZToiKQogCSAgICAob3JnLWVsZW1lbnQtcHJvcGVydHkgOnR5 cGUgKG9yZy1lbGVtZW50LWNvbnRleHQpKSkpKSkKIAorKGVydC1kZWZ0ZXN0IHRlc3Qtb3JnLWVs ZW1lbnQvb3JnLW9wZW4tYXQtcG9pbnQgKCkKKyAgIlRlc3QgYG9yZy1vcGVuLWF0LXBvaW50JyB3 aXRoIGxpbmsgYmVpbmcgYSBoZWFkaW5nIHByb3BlcnR5LiIKKyAgKG9yZy10ZXN0LXdpdGgtdGVt cC10ZXh0CisgICAgICAiKiBIZWFkbGluZQorOlBST1BFUlRJRVM6Cis6VVJMOiA8cG9pbnQ+W1tp bmZvOm9yZyNUb3BdXQorOkVORDoiCisgICAgKG9yZy1vcGVuLWF0LXBvaW50KSkpCisKIAogOzs7 OyBNYWNybwogCi0tIAoxLjguNAoK --bcaec51a8bd20778ff04fabbf87e--