From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Joseph Vidal-Rosset Subject: Re: gnus: link annoyance Date: Tue, 7 Jan 2014 18:09:52 +0100 Message-ID: References: <87zjn9w79w.fsf@iro.umontreal.ca> <874n5hca77.fsf@pank.eu> <87ha9g2w1p.fsf@iro.umontreal.ca> <8738kzgbv4.fsf@crunchbang.i-did-not-set--mail-host-address--so-tickle-me> <871u0jesy6.fsf@iro.umontreal.ca> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=14dae9cc9f680d331d04ef6473f0 Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:47186) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1W0aAR-0005qC-WD for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Tue, 07 Jan 2014 12:10:20 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1W0aAP-0007Uk-Ok for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Tue, 07 Jan 2014 12:10:15 -0500 Received: from mail-wg0-x235.google.com ([2a00:1450:400c:c00::235]:36828) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1W0aAP-0007Ua-Ij for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Tue, 07 Jan 2014 12:10:13 -0500 Received: by mail-wg0-f53.google.com with SMTP id k14so410575wgh.8 for ; Tue, 07 Jan 2014 09:10:12 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <871u0jesy6.fsf@iro.umontreal.ca> List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org To: =?UTF-8?Q?Fran=C3=A7ois_Pinard?= Cc: emacs-orgmode list --14dae9cc9f680d331d04ef6473f0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable 2014/1/7 Fran=C3=A7ois Pinard > I'm far from being sure, but if I wanted to use Org as a mean to write > HTML or PDF as message attachments, I would think it could be done with > a very moderate amount of Emacs Lisp customization. Unless mistaken, > the Org editor to HTML might yield its output in a temporary Emacs > buffer, (for PDF, maybe not) and I would be fairly surprised if message > composition does not have facilities to receive attachments from > buffers. And even if one would have to go through an external file, the > extra overhead might be negligible in practice. Putting all the pieces > together might require some work, but maybe not that much. > Thanks for the reply. Unfortunately, I am not at all able to do such a work, and I very probably will never be able to. But maybe this suggestion will be interesting for an emacs org-mode developer, who knows... Best whishes, et meilleurs voeux pour 2014. Joseph --14dae9cc9f680d331d04ef6473f0 Content-Type: text/html; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

= 2014/1/7 Fran=C3=A7ois Pinard <pinard@iro.umontreal.ca>
I'm far from being sure, but= if I wanted to use Org as a mean to write
HTML or PDF as message attachments, I would think it could be done with
a very moderate amount of Emacs Lisp customization. =C2=A0Unless mistaken,<= br> the Org editor to HTML might yield its output in a temporary Emacs
buffer, (for PDF, maybe not) and I would be fairly surprised if message
composition does not have facilities to receive attachments from
buffers. =C2=A0And even if one would have to go through an external file, t= he
extra overhead might be negligible in practice. =C2=A0Putting all the piece= s
together might require some work, but maybe not that much.

Thanks for the reply. Unfortunately, I am =C2=A0not at all able= to do such a work, and I very probably will never be able to.=C2=A0
<= div class=3D"gmail_extra"> But maybe this suggestion will be interesting for an emacs org-mode develop= er, who knows...

Best whishes, et meilleurs voeux pour 2014.=C2=A0

Joseph=C2=A0
--14dae9cc9f680d331d04ef6473f0--