From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Yuri Niyazov Subject: Re: Agenda with an archived indicator Date: Tue, 30 Dec 2014 01:47:36 -0800 Message-ID: References: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:52125) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Y5tPY-0007m4-D9 for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Tue, 30 Dec 2014 04:48:21 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Y5tPX-00052e-Kd for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Tue, 30 Dec 2014 04:48:20 -0500 Received: from mail-la0-x234.google.com ([2a00:1450:4010:c03::234]:36071) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Y5tPX-00052L-D5 for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Tue, 30 Dec 2014 04:48:19 -0500 Received: by mail-la0-f52.google.com with SMTP id hs14so12202233lab.25 for ; Tue, 30 Dec 2014 01:48:17 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org To: emacs-orgmode@gnu.org Any ideas on this, anyone? On Sun, Dec 28, 2014 at 2:30 AM, Yuri Niyazov wrote: > I am trying to build an agenda view that includes both Archived and > non-Archived items, and includes an indicator whether an item is > archived or not. Here's how I've gotten it to work so far: > > In custom agenda: > > (... (org-agenda-prefix-format "%(yn/org-archived-display) > %-11c%-11T%-11s") ... ) > > (defun yn/org-archived-display () > (if (get-text-property (point-at-bol) :org-archived) > "A" > " ")) > > > I figured if I learned how org-agenda skips over archived org entries > while building the display, that will give some insight into what the > code inside that expression should look like, so that code is derived > from org-agenda-skip. > > This has an appreciable slow-down while building the agenda, I assume > it's because it is re-parsing the item. Is there something in the > environment of the expressions in %() that can be efficiently > interrogated for archived/not archived status?