From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Yuri Niyazov Subject: Re: Agenda with an archived indicator Date: Tue, 30 Dec 2014 10:36:18 -0800 Message-ID: References: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:42673) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Y61f0-0005JQ-Rn for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Tue, 30 Dec 2014 13:36:51 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Y61ez-0000gk-V9 for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Tue, 30 Dec 2014 13:36:50 -0500 Received: from mail-la0-x22a.google.com ([2a00:1450:4010:c03::22a]:52410) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Y61ez-0000gg-O1 for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Tue, 30 Dec 2014 13:36:49 -0500 Received: by mail-la0-f42.google.com with SMTP id gd6so13167614lab.1 for ; Tue, 30 Dec 2014 10:36:49 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org To: emacs-orgmode@gnu.org test On Tue, Dec 30, 2014 at 1:47 AM, Yuri Niyazov wrote: > Any ideas on this, anyone? > > On Sun, Dec 28, 2014 at 2:30 AM, Yuri Niyazov wrote: >> I am trying to build an agenda view that includes both Archived and >> non-Archived items, and includes an indicator whether an item is >> archived or not. Here's how I've gotten it to work so far: >> >> In custom agenda: >> >> (... (org-agenda-prefix-format "%(yn/org-archived-display) >> %-11c%-11T%-11s") ... ) >> >> (defun yn/org-archived-display () >> (if (get-text-property (point-at-bol) :org-archived) >> "A" >> " ")) >> >> >> I figured if I learned how org-agenda skips over archived org entries >> while building the display, that will give some insight into what the >> code inside that expression should look like, so that code is derived >> from org-agenda-skip. >> >> This has an appreciable slow-down while building the agenda, I assume >> it's because it is re-parsing the item. Is there something in the >> environment of the expressions in %() that can be efficiently >> interrogated for archived/not archived status?