From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: =?ISO-8859-1?B?CUpvcmdlIFRpbfNu?= Subject: Re: =<<<...>>>= invalid Date: Tue, 18 Sep 2012 20:12:56 +0200 Message-ID: References: <87k3vsa1vb.fsf@Rainer.invalid> <10059.1347915226@alphaville.americas.hpqcorp.net> <11002.1347917582@alphaville.americas.hpqcorp.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:51030) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1TE2I6-0001TM-RT for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Tue, 18 Sep 2012 14:12:59 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1TE2I5-0005IH-LT for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Tue, 18 Sep 2012 14:12:58 -0400 Received: from mail-lpp01m010-f41.google.com ([209.85.215.41]:53561) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1TE2I5-0005I2-Ed for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Tue, 18 Sep 2012 14:12:57 -0400 Received: by lahd3 with SMTP id d3so101257lah.0 for ; Tue, 18 Sep 2012 11:12:56 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Cc: emacs-orgmode@gnu.org Org-mode version 6.30c at home, even with the snapshot. I'll probably update and follow your advice, thank you. On 9/18/12, Jorge Tim=F3n wrote: > I still get \texttt{<<<} \ldots{} \texttt{>>>} > > I have Org-mode version 6.33x at work. I'll check later at home, where > I have both emacs23 and emacs24 (snapshot). > > On 9/17/12, Nick Dokos wrote: >> Jorge Tim=F3n wrote: >> >>> I wouldn't care about the spaces and I would prefer not to use latex. >>> The problem is that that produces: >>> >>> \texttt{<<<} \ldots{} \texttt{>>>} >>> >> >> Did you try it with the tildes instead of the equal signs? >> Here, both old and new exporters produce >> >> aaa \verb~<<<~ \ldots{} \verb~>>>~ aa a a >> >> at least with the version I'm running (Org-mode version 7.9.1 >> (release_7.9.1-214-gf025d1)) >> >> Nick >> >>> and then latex joins the first << and the first >> together, which is >>> really ugly. >>> >>> My document is already LaTeX specific, but if I'm able replace more >>> latex with org mode, I should consider a later edition of the tex >>> produced to keep it backend-independent. Not critical for this >>> document, but it is always cool to be able to export to different >>> formats. >>> >>> Thank you for the suggestion, anyway. >>> >>> On 9/17/12, Nick Dokos wrote: >>> > Jorge Tim=F3n wrote: >>> > >>> >> The only way I know to do what I want is \verb=3D<<<=3D...\verb=3D>>= >=3D, in >>> >> case someone has a similar problem. >>> >> >>> > >>> > If you don't mind the extra space around the dots, you can say >>> > >>> > aaa ~<<<~ ... ~>>>~ aa a a >>> > >>> > the advantage being that it is backend-independent, so it will export >>> > correctly to HTML and presumably all the other backends --- at least >>> > with the new exporter: I didn't try the old one. >>> > >>> > There are ways to deal with the spaces as well (the one before the >>> > dots >>> > is no problem: it's the one after that causes a problem in this case)= , >>> > but imo they are not worth the bother unless you really, really need >>> > that >>> > exact behavior. I'd rather live with the spaces (or edit the resultin= g >>> > latex >>> > file, but that has disadvantages of its own). >>> > >>> > Nick >>> > >>> > >>> > >>> > >>> >>> >>> -- >>> Jorge Tim=F3n >>> >> > > > -- > Jorge Tim=F3n > --=20 Jorge Tim=F3n