From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Grant Rettke <gcr@wisdomandwonder.com>
Subject: Re: How to handle an inline multiline noweb reference
Date: Tue, 27 Nov 2018 20:08:20 -0600
Message-ID: <CAAjq1meyEEKyUn8A03doMr8c-45ccZaN8ZACmZvSZSvyR=PsxQ@mail.gmail.com>
References: <87wooykg59.fsf@mbork.pl>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Return-path: <emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>
Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:44467)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <grettke@gmail.com>) id 1gRpHN-0001Mg-5N
	for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Tue, 27 Nov 2018 21:08:41 -0500
Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <grettke@gmail.com>) id 1gRpHJ-0006ZF-S6
	for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Tue, 27 Nov 2018 21:08:41 -0500
Received: from mail-lf1-f47.google.com ([209.85.167.47]:38805)
	by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16)
	(Exim 4.71) (envelope-from <grettke@gmail.com>) id 1gRpHJ-0006Yt-KE
	for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Tue, 27 Nov 2018 21:08:37 -0500
Received: by mail-lf1-f47.google.com with SMTP id p86so18165744lfg.5
	for <emacs-orgmode@gnu.org>; Tue, 27 Nov 2018 18:08:37 -0800 (PST)
In-Reply-To: <87wooykg59.fsf@mbork.pl>
List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." <emacs-orgmode.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/options/emacs-orgmode>,
	<mailto:emacs-orgmode-request@gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/emacs-orgmode/>
List-Post: <mailto:emacs-orgmode@gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:emacs-orgmode-request@gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-orgmode>,
	<mailto:emacs-orgmode-request@gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
Sender: "Emacs-orgmode"
	<emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>
To: mbork@mbork.pl
Cc: Org-mode <emacs-orgmode@gnu.org>

On Tue, Nov 27, 2018 at 3:57 AM Marcin Borkowski <mbork@mbork.pl> wrote:
> but it's fairly complicated.  Any better ideas?

What is the part that you think is too complicated?