From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Grant Rettke Subject: Should C-c C-c always jump between a footnote and its definition? C-c C-x f, too? Date: Fri, 20 Jun 2014 15:55:11 -0500 Message-ID: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:51986) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Wy5q5-0000l4-LD for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Fri, 20 Jun 2014 16:55:14 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Wy5q4-0006Kc-5L for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Fri, 20 Jun 2014 16:55:13 -0400 Received: from mail-ob0-x22c.google.com ([2607:f8b0:4003:c01::22c]:42279) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Wy5q4-0006KV-0l for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Fri, 20 Jun 2014 16:55:12 -0400 Received: by mail-ob0-f172.google.com with SMTP id uy5so1670542obc.17 for ; Fri, 20 Jun 2014 13:55:11 -0700 (PDT) List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org To: "emacs-orgmode@gnu.org" Good evening, Today I noticed that hitting C-c C-c won't always jump back and forth between its reference. I assume that this because there may be many, and that makes sense. The other thing that I noticed, though is that C-c C-x f sometimes works and sometimes doesn't. Specifically, sometimes it goes to the newly created footnote, and sometimes it doesn't. However, this is just on my one file. Here is what I mean: File: https://github.com/grettke/home/blob/master/TC3F.org Emacs init: https://github.com/grettke/home/blob/master/.emacs.el Emacs: 24.3.1 org: 8.2.7 Here is the simplest example, but this is code just representative by hand in Emacs: (find-file "TC3F.org") (got-char 1642) (org-ctrl-c-ctrl-c) That moves the cursor up to line 37, instead of where the footnote lives on 3898. Ideas: 1. I screwed up the format of the footnotes. 2. Go back in version control and manually cope with this. I would still like the understand the issue. Tried: 1. Renumbering the footnotes with C-u C-c C-x f, but got the same behavior. Now, I am asking for help, because this one is odd to see. Kind regards, Grant Rettke | ACM, ASA, FSF, IEEE, SIAM gcr@wisdomandwonder.com | http://www.wisdomandwonder.com/ =E2=80=9CWisdom begins in wonder.=E2=80=9D --Socrates ((=CE=BB (x) (x x)) (=CE=BB (x) (x x))) =E2=80=9CLife has become immeasurably better since I have been forced to st= op taking it seriously.=E2=80=9D --Thompson